TCCANARY 263 Posted January 7, 2016 [quote] I watch football for the same, but what''s wrong with discussing a bit of analysis, see where we''ve been good, see where we''ve been bad, think about other players we could bring inm see how the stats match up to what we''ve seen in reality etc. It is a discussion board after all. Isn''t that what non match days are for? I completely agree though, if we are bottom of every stat going but above 18th in the league come the end of the season, I won''t really care.[/quote]I don''t recall seeing any stats from Grefstad that show where we''ve been good, he seems to only focus on the bad ones. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grefstad 0 Posted January 7, 2016 [quote user="TCCANARY"]I don''t recall seeing any stats from Grefstad that show where we''ve been good, he seems to only focus on the bad ones.  [/quote]The reason is obvious, Norwich are near the bottom of most stats at Whoscored.com.Instead of moaning about how terrible this is for you and Norwich, take some time to see the stats for yourself, and make your own mind up.Or perhaps it is better with the head-in-the-sand approach? Best not to know? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Jenkins 0 Posted January 7, 2016 Villa seem to do quite well on stats. Glad we''re not cut adrift at the bottom of the table though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lessingham Canary 99 Posted January 7, 2016 Stats are all about interpretation, interpret them wrong and they are costly, have to be careful not to be blinded by stats, the important ones are, imo; Games played, Wins, Lost, Draws, goals for, goals against, goal difference +/-, points accumulated, can work out most things from where constant improvement is needed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tetteys Jig 830 Posted January 7, 2016 [quote user="Mr Jenkins"]Villa seem to do quite well on stats. Glad we''re not cut adrift at the bottom of the table though.[/quote]http://www.whoscored.com/Teams/24they really don''t Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TCCANARY 263 Posted January 7, 2016 Aerials won - 11thPosession - 15th (Leicester 18th)Discipline - 13th (Arsenal 20th)Tackles per game - 2ndFouls per game - 9thOffside per game - 8thDribbles - 15th (Southampton 20th)Least fouled team (got to be good for avoiding injuries)More shots on target per game than Stoke. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tetteys Jig 830 Posted January 7, 2016 Villa have the most yellow cards in the league, so I dunno where that discipline stat is derived is from.As for the "tackles per game" surely it''s a good thing if you make tackles. They don''t obviously make them well enough.Saying that though, Villa have probably not been as bad as their meagre points total says. I''d call into question their mentality and fight. We''ve started to be able to pick up points in games where we haven''t been at our best through sheer determination and keeping our heads up when the going has got tough. That Everton game for instance, probably the most one sided football match i''ve seen this season 1st half but we went in only 1-0 down and scrapped for a point. Villa faced with similar situations have wilted. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
morty 0 Posted January 7, 2016 So stats alone say Villa aren''t that bad.Well, thats interesting.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tetteys Jig 830 Posted January 7, 2016 [quote user="morty"]So stats alone say Villa aren''t that bad.Well, thats interesting....[/quote]Say it then, your point is that you don''t think Martin Olsson is as bad as the stats say and you think he is an effective member of the team. I''ve said I agree with that but think we are far better with Brady there based both on stats and from what i''ve seen of him live and on TV this season at full back.There''s some water to the "Olsson plays harder teams" arguement, but I don''t think it''s a coincidence that we''ve had our best results and in my view better performances with Brady at left back instead.Anything else you wish to add? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TCCANARY 263 Posted January 7, 2016 [quote user="TCCANARY"]Aerials won - 11th Posession - 15th (Leicester 18th) Discipline - 13th (Arsenal 20th) Tackles per game - 2nd Fouls per game - 9th Offside per game - 8th Dribbles - 15th (Southampton 20th) Least fouled team (got to be good for avoiding injuries) More shots on target per game than Stoke.[/quote] That''s a couple of interesting replies because they''re not Villa''s stats they''re ours. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Faded Jaded Semi Plastic SOB 1,040 Posted January 7, 2016 Well that explains why the question I asked a while ago about our stats relative to those of Aston Villa was never answered, kind of holes the whole stats thing below the waterline. As i said before when asked about the "running around" stats the response from Alex Neil was along the lines of "perhaps we are more efficient than other teams", suggesting he was not particularly bothered. There is one set of stats that is tangible, and accurate at any given point in the season, it is called the league table.......... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tetteys Jig 830 Posted January 7, 2016 [quote user="TCCANARY"][quote user="TCCANARY"]Aerials won - 11th Posession - 15th (Leicester 18th) Discipline - 13th (Arsenal 20th) Tackles per game - 2nd Fouls per game - 9th Offside per game - 8th Dribbles - 15th (Southampton 20th) Least fouled team (got to be good for avoiding injuries) More shots on target per game than Stoke.[/quote] That''s a couple of interesting replies because they''re not Villa''s stats they''re ours.  [/quote]Lol, fair enough, I only called you out on the discipline one as it didn''t seem right but the rest suggest we''re mid to lower table. I wonder where Villa are with these?From what i''ve deduced, Villa are down there both because of poor mental strength in close games and the fact they are wasteful in front of goal with their few chances mainly.The tackles per game one is one I think we do struggle with sometimes backing off players. I''d say that''s adapting to facing more skilful players that has done that as we see with the penalties we''ve conceded over the years. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tetteys Jig 830 Posted January 7, 2016 [quote user="Faded Jaded Semi Plastic SOB"]Well that explains why the question I asked a while ago about our stats relative to those of Aston Villa was never answered, kind of holes the whole stats thing below the waterline. As i said before when asked about the "running around" stats the response from Alex Neil was along the lines of "perhaps we are more efficient than other teams", suggesting he was not particularly bothered. There is one set of stats that is tangible, and accurate at any given point in the season, it is called the league table..........[/quote]I think you''re mainly making it a black and white "stats don''t matter at all" issue when it''s a grey area. Yes some stats you don''t have to worry about as they are a result of tactics played etc. but some, like pass accuracy if you are trying to play possession football etc. do matter.For example, I''d say that Bradley Johnson is no longer with us mainly because of his unreliable passing in a league we can''t afford to give the ball away as cheaply in.There are a lot of telling stats that as the games go on, the cream will rise to the top in the long run. It''s not obviously the be all and end all but we might as well shut down our whole performance analysis department if stats didn''t matter. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TCCANARY 263 Posted January 7, 2016 Why do you think that we struggle with tackles per game when the stats say we are the second best? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Jenkins 0 Posted January 7, 2016 Using stats to try and call people out as Happy Clappers or any other term that Gref wishes to use really is scraping the barrel. The only stat I am really interested in is the League table, that''s not open to interpretation or spin, discuss stats all you want but please don''t use them as a means to bash other posters by stating or implying they are " happy clappers" . That''s far from the truth and also insulting. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tetteys Jig 830 Posted January 7, 2016 We make the second most tackles... We are ranked second on amount of tackles, not on quality.As we''ve seen particularly in first halves of many games, we''ve sat back and soaked up a lot of pressure. It''s something we''ve massively got good at recently.As a result of not having much possession and territory, we''ve let teams sit around our final third but have become much tougher to break down in recent weeks. Before that, we were still doing the same tactic but getting picked off easier.Having Tettey back to form has been a big helping hand. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grefstad 0 Posted January 7, 2016 RTeamDribbledPastTotalAttemptedTacklesRating1Leicester10.933.67.012Sunderland11.232.16.693Liverpool9.432.16.834Chelsea10.131.26.815Newcastle United10.3316.686Manchester City1230.56.997Arsenal10.5307.088Watford9.429.86.859Stoke10.729.86.8010West Ham9.629.66.9211Manchester United10.129.56.8212Tottenham7.8297.0013Bournemouth10.228.96.7314Everton9.328.46.9315Crystal Palace9.727.86.8516Southampton826.76.8317Aston Villa8.126.46.7218West Bromwich Albion9.726.16.7419Norwich925.46.6720Swansea9.324.76.69 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grefstad 0 Posted January 7, 2016 RTeamTotalRating1Leicester22.27.012Watford19.86.853Aston Villa19.46.724Arsenal197.085Tottenham18.47.006West Bromwich Albion18.16.747Southampton17.66.838West Ham17.16.929Newcastle United16.56.6810Crystal Palace16.36.8511Swansea16.26.6912Bournemouth166.7313Manchester United15.36.8214Stoke15.36.8015Sunderland15.36.6916Manchester City15.16.9917Chelsea14.36.8118Liverpool146.8319Everton12.96.9320Norwich11.96.67 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grefstad 0 Posted January 7, 2016 The last post was for Interceptions made. Norwich bottom... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grefstad 0 Posted January 7, 2016 [quote user="Mr Jenkins"]Using stats to try and call people out as Happy Clappers or any other term that Gref wishes to use really is scraping the barrel. The only stat I am really interested in is the League table, that''s not open to interpretation or spin, discuss stats all you want but please don''t use them as a means to bash other posters by stating or implying they are " happy clappers" . That''s far from the truth and also insulting.[/quote]its getting late, Jenkins. Go back to farting in the couch with Mrs Jenkins, while we check the stats... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Buh 0 Posted January 7, 2016 Referees attitude towards us the major cause of itThere attitude is "it''s only Norwich who cares if i get it wrong"Look at how Clattenburg Reffed the Swansea game (especially the last 5 minutes, never seen a tight win celebrated and then the referee booed off the pitch before!) and whoever the idiot was for the first game who overruled ketones perfectly legitimate goalThey just view is with utter contempt. It''s a disgrace frankly.For a while I''ve maintained we should be trialling getting referees from abroad. The domestic stock is nowhere near sufficient so we need to outsource it.No more refs pally with the well known players and mugging us off because we haven''t been in the prem forever! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grefstad 0 Posted January 7, 2016 Some more defensive stats. This is sorted on Tackles made per game. Joint 2nd worst... RTeamShots pgTackles pgInterceptions pgFouls pgOffsides pgRating1Leicester13.222.722.210.91.27.012Liverpool9.922.71411.62.76.833Tottenham11.321.218.412.92.27.004Chelsea11.821.114.311.31.96.815Sunderland15.820.915.311.126.696Newcastle United16.720.716.510.41.76.687Watford12.420.419.811.71.26.858West Ham15.720.117.1101.86.929Arsenal11.419.5198.72.27.0810Manchester United919.415.312.41.86.8211Stoke15.319.215.310.52.96.8012Everton13.819.112.98.71.66.9313Southampton1218.717.610.42.76.8314Bournemouth10.918.7169.726.7315Manchester City918.615.110.41.56.9916Aston Villa12.918.319.412.21.36.7217Crystal Palace15.318.116.312.72.36.8518Norwich13.116.411.9112.26.6719West Bromwich Albion14.116.418.110.11.66.7420Swansea12.615.416.29.92.76.69 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TCCANARY 263 Posted January 7, 2016 1Arsenal15.620256.485.014.87.082West Ham13.727447.076.518.26.923Everton13.329252.182.312.46.934Stoke10.829449.178.515.16.805Chelsea13.931354.781.615.46.816Bournemouth12.431152.080.216.76.737Norwich11.232246.575.915.86.678Swansea11.632052.782.214.76.699Leicester13.533043.869.818.27.0110Manchester United11.633057.383.913.46.8211Crystal Palace12.333146.775.415.86.8512Southampton14.534350.778.419.36.8313Manchester City17.436055.783.714.86.9914Watford12.137245.872.115.86.8515Newcastle United9.338345.976.513.16.6816Sunderland10.939242.973.018.76.6917Liverpool16.239154.779.418.66.8318West Bromwich Albion9.840342.471.718.16.7419Aston Villa10.743049.878.7206.7220Tottenham15.343054.180.114.17.00 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TCCANARY 263 Posted January 7, 2016 TeamShots pgDisciplinePossession%PassSuccess%AerialsWonRating1Manchester United11.633057.383.913.46.822Arsenal15.620256.485.014.87.083Manchester City17.436055.783.714.86.994Chelsea13.931354.781.615.46.815Liverpool16.239154.779.418.66.836Tottenham15.343054.180.114.17.007Swansea11.632052.782.214.76.698Everton13.329252.182.312.46.939Bournemouth12.431152.080.216.76.7310Southampton14.534350.778.419.36.8311Aston Villa10.743049.878.7206.7212Stoke10.829449.178.515.16.8013West Ham13.727447.076.518.26.9214Crystal Palace12.333146.775.415.86.8515Norwich11.232246.575.915.86.6716Newcastle United9.338345.976.513.16.6817Watford12.137245.872.115.86.8518Leicester13.533043.869.818.27.0119Sunderland10.939242.973.018.76.6920West Bromwich Albion9.840342.471.718.16.74 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
morty 0 Posted January 7, 2016 Stats really do bore the tits off me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grefstad 0 Posted January 7, 2016 [quote user="Buh"]Referees attitude towards us the major cause of itThere attitude is "it''s only Norwich who cares if i get it wrong"Look at how Clattenburg Reffed the Swansea game (especially the last 5 minutes, never seen a tight win celebrated and then the referee booed off the pitch before!) and whoever the idiot was for the first game who overruled ketones perfectly legitimate goalThey just view is with utter contempt. It''s a disgrace frankly.For a while I''ve maintained we should be trialling getting referees from abroad. The domestic stock is nowhere near sufficient so we need to outsource it.No more refs pally with the well known players and mugging us off because we haven''t been in the prem forever![/quote] I''m tempted to agree to this, somewhat. I believe we suffer a bit from being a "small" club, playing with the big boys. But we also suffer for not having players that are "suited" to getting penalties (quick players breaking into the box frequently).We do have players that are likely to concede penalties though (slow defenders, poor positioning, clumsy attempts at tackling, standing off until you have to tackle, often in the area, etc.I also think our players lack a bit of "streetwiseness", in the meaning "creating" situations where things may be given for us. Holty was a master of this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TCCANARY 263 Posted January 7, 2016 TeamShots pgDisciplinePossession%PassSuccess%AerialsWonRating1Norwich11.232246.575.915.86.672Newcastle United9.338345.976.513.16.683Sunderland10.939242.973.018.76.694Swansea11.632052.782.214.76.695Aston Villa10.743049.878.7206.726Bournemouth12.431152.080.216.76.737West Bromwich Albion9.840342.471.718.16.748Stoke10.829449.178.515.16.809Chelsea13.931354.781.615.46.8110Manchester United11.633057.383.913.46.8211Liverpool16.239154.779.418.66.8312Southampton14.534350.778.419.36.8313Watford12.137245.872.115.86.8514Crystal Palace12.333146.775.415.86.8515West Ham13.727447.076.518.26.9216Everton13.329252.182.312.46.9317Manchester City17.436055.783.714.86.9918Tottenham15.343054.180.114.17.0019Leicester13.533043.869.818.27.0120Arsenal15.620256.485.014.87.08 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ZLF 274 Posted January 7, 2016 I think its Newcastle who are on the longest current run without a penalty.Must be a letter N conspiracy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grefstad 0 Posted January 7, 2016 [quote user="morty"]Stats really do bore the tits off me.[/quote] Yes, must be awful to see people actually posting something which may interest others, instead of the constant squibble and derailing you normally put up in these forums. Also, probably boring when facts show that claims made, although previusly harassed by the infamous Morty actually hold some water. Must be awful. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TCCANARY 263 Posted January 7, 2016 eamShots pgShots OT pgDribbles pgFouled pgRating1Everton13.34.612.611.36.932Arsenal15.65.712.611.77.083Aston Villa10.73.311.99.76.724Chelsea13.94.111.313.56.815Bournemouth12.4411.210.86.736Leicester13.54.810.58.87.017Crystal Palace12.34.410.211.26.858Manchester City17.46.510.110.36.999Liverpool16.24.7108.96.8310Stoke10.83.410106.8011Tottenham15.36.29.610.57.0012West Ham13.74.89.311.86.9213Newcastle United9.33.39.210.96.6814Manchester United11.63.89106.8215Norwich11.23.68.37.36.6716Watford12.13.88.310.16.8517Sunderland10.93.58.110.26.6918Swansea11.63.78.112.56.6919West Bromwich Albion9.83.27.7106.7420Southampton14.54.77.19.46.83 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites