jaemae2

[quote user="pete"] Don''t see it happening who would really want him. .[/quote] More clubs than would want Hooper...

[quote user="Paul101"]young English and going my his under 21 team mates 9-15m but... wouldn''t pay that for him but the going rate is in that bracket[/quote] Every single player that has played for the U-21s is of exactly the same value. Yep, truly the case... Seriously...

[quote user="pete"]Although struggled in the Premier NR turned it on for U21''s if he continues to do so his value will not go down so keep him and see him blossom under NA.[/quote] You understand he isn''t playing people U-21 in the Championship, right????

My mom isn''t interested in fat asses who are utter garbage at fussball... He is rapeing the club I support though.

[quote user="mrs miggins"]why would he go to another championship team?[/quote] Because no one wants him, doubt even Reading do.

[quote user="alartz"]Definite tard I don''t think it would be much of a loss On evidence which ones would you rather have to date RvW and hooper or grabban lafferty jerome Made my choice[/quote] Grabban, RVW, Lafferty, Jerome, Becchio, Loza, lowest goal scorer in the 7th division>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hooper.

[quote user="alartz"][quote user="Cheap Cheap Canaries"]I would hope not , believe if he had been playing yesterday we would have won by four .[/quote] How do you work that out? Grabban could have scored 2 more if it weren''t for a couple of good saves[/quote] you work it out by being a moron and think having success in the SPL means something.

[quote user="alartz"][quote user="Cheap Cheap Canaries"]I would hope not , believe if he had been playing yesterday we would have won by four .[/quote] How do you work that out? Grabban could have scored 2 more if it weren''t for a couple of good saves[/quote] you work it out by being a moron and think having success in the SPL means something.

Would be a dream as it would rid the team of utter garbage as well as significantly weaken another Championship club, hope it can get done. Reading would likely get relegated with the lowest goal total in the league if it did...

[quote user="Indy"][quote user="mrs miggins"]don''t bother Indy, I tried to make a point yesterday, all he did was confuse himself, the best thing is to leave it. Leave it for greater minds than he[/quote] I believe you''re right! I''m not sure what he was trying to get at? Not surprising as I"m getting at you are a moron, as is Miggins... The fact neither of you get that, speaks for itself... Words are hard, I know... It''s another great win and all players should feel proud of the response since the Wolves game. Great for Adams, players, the board and us the fans. :-)[/quote]

[quote user="Indy"][quote user="jaemae2"][quote user="Indy"]Why the negative comments again? If he had the end product some expect he would not be playing for Norwich![/quote] What a deep and insightful thought... My god...[/quote] What do you mean? If you read on here what people expect from a lightning fast 20 year old, he''d be playing for Chelsea or Man City. Some on here think he should be Garath Bale!![/quote] The statement is stupid. Right up there with the stupidity people that think he should be Gareth Bale. You could say "If (insert ANY RANDOM PLAYER NAME HERE) had so and so and so and so they''d be playing (add any top club name))",. Saying a stupid thing because other people say stupid things, isn''t a defense....

[quote user="Indy"]Why the negative comments again? If he had the end product some expect he would not be playing for Norwich![/quote] What a deep and insightful thought... My god...

[quote user="mrs miggins"]jaemae2 wrote the following post at 22/08/2014 11:00 PM: You might not want to talk about intelligence. You were proven statistically wrong. Tell me how great Boyd was once he left Scotland. How did Jerome do other than 1 year in the Championship. You may have an IQ of 10, I can get how you don''t understand. ------------------------------------------ whats not to understand? I gave you the statistics (they weren''t statistically wrong, are you that stupid?), you said ''no you''ve got to count from when they were both 22 years old,'' so thenyou then gave me your stats from when you started counting, and from this we can officially conclude kris boyd is better than Hooper. Thats right everyone, you heard it here first; kris boyd is now better that hooper because when they were both in the SPL, for a short amount of time, kris boyd scored more goals. Although you''ve totally missed the point of what I was saying and, on a side note had the audacity to say my stats were ''proven'' wrong, I was wondering, in what way were they proven wrong? I took the amount of time each player was in the SPL and compared their goals to games ratio, you then, because your agenda against Hooper, only considered part of the statistics from a point in time. Again I would ask you to read the original post because I don''t know how anyone can get that upset over someone saying Hooper will be great in this league and then manipulate stats to fit their prejudices..its crazy.[/quote] I''m not surprised it''s hard for you to understand why it''s mentally incompetent to compare 1 player playing games over a span of 6 year when he''s 16-22 with another player who only played in the same league for 3 years when he was 22-24. If you want to do that, let''s add up Hooper''s goals from the time he was 16-22 and compare them with Boyds. I apparently was wrong and being that stupid would be a remarkable achievement that you will never be smart enough to reach.

[quote user="mrs miggins"]*FACEPALM* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bobp5OHVsWY I don''t think there''s any point responding to you in any different way, stupidity mixed with aggression, fantastic.[/quote] You might not want to talk about intelligence. You were proven statistically wrong. Tell me how great Boyd was once he left Scotland. How did Jerome do other than 1 year in the Championship. You may have an IQ of 10, I can get how you don''t understand.

Proven goalscorer in this league based on that 1 year...