jaemae2

[quote user="pete"] Don''t see it happening who would really want him. .[/quote] More clubs than would want Hooper...

[quote user="Paul101"]young English and going my his under 21 team mates 9-15m but... wouldn''t pay that for him but the going rate is in that bracket[/quote] Every single player that has played for the U-21s is of exactly the same value. Yep, truly the case... Seriously...

[quote user="pete"]Although struggled in the Premier NR turned it on for U21''s if he continues to do so his value will not go down so keep him and see him blossom under NA.[/quote] You understand he isn''t playing people U-21 in the Championship, right????

My mom isn''t interested in fat asses who are utter garbage at fussball... He is rapeing the club I support though.

[quote user="mrs miggins"]why would he go to another championship team?[/quote] Because no one wants him, doubt even Reading do.

[quote user="alartz"]Definite tard I don''t think it would be much of a loss On evidence which ones would you rather have to date RvW and hooper or grabban lafferty jerome Made my choice[/quote] Grabban, RVW, Lafferty, Jerome, Becchio, Loza, lowest goal scorer in the 7th division>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hooper.

[quote user="alartz"][quote user="Cheap Cheap Canaries"]I would hope not , believe if he had been playing yesterday we would have won by four .[/quote] How do you work that out? Grabban could have scored 2 more if it weren''t for a couple of good saves[/quote] you work it out by being a moron and think having success in the SPL means something.

[quote user="alartz"][quote user="Cheap Cheap Canaries"]I would hope not , believe if he had been playing yesterday we would have won by four .[/quote] How do you work that out? Grabban could have scored 2 more if it weren''t for a couple of good saves[/quote] you work it out by being a moron and think having success in the SPL means something.

Would be a dream as it would rid the team of utter garbage as well as significantly weaken another Championship club, hope it can get done. Reading would likely get relegated with the lowest goal total in the league if it did...

[quote user="Indy"][quote user="mrs miggins"]don''t bother Indy, I tried to make a point yesterday, all he did was confuse himself, the best thing is to leave it. Leave it for greater minds than he[/quote] I believe you''re right! I''m not sure what he was trying to get at? Not surprising as I"m getting at you are a moron, as is Miggins... The fact neither of you get that, speaks for itself... Words are hard, I know... It''s another great win and all players should feel proud of the response since the Wolves game. Great for Adams, players, the board and us the fans. :-)[/quote]

[quote user="Indy"][quote user="jaemae2"][quote user="Indy"]Why the negative comments again? If he had the end product some expect he would not be playing for Norwich![/quote] What a deep and insightful thought... My god...[/quote] What do you mean? If you read on here what people expect from a lightning fast 20 year old, he''d be playing for Chelsea or Man City. Some on here think he should be Garath Bale!![/quote] The statement is stupid. Right up there with the stupidity people that think he should be Gareth Bale. You could say "If (insert ANY RANDOM PLAYER NAME HERE) had so and so and so and so they''d be playing (add any top club name))",. Saying a stupid thing because other people say stupid things, isn''t a defense....

[quote user="Indy"]Why the negative comments again? If he had the end product some expect he would not be playing for Norwich![/quote] What a deep and insightful thought... My god...

[quote user="mrs miggins"]jaemae2 wrote the following post at 22/08/2014 11:00 PM: You might not want to talk about intelligence. You were proven statistically wrong. Tell me how great Boyd was once he left Scotland. How did Jerome do other than 1 year in the Championship. You may have an IQ of 10, I can get how you don''t understand. ------------------------------------------ whats not to understand? I gave you the statistics (they weren''t statistically wrong, are you that stupid?), you said ''no you''ve got to count from when they were both 22 years old,'' so thenyou then gave me your stats from when you started counting, and from this we can officially conclude kris boyd is better than Hooper. Thats right everyone, you heard it here first; kris boyd is now better that hooper because when they were both in the SPL, for a short amount of time, kris boyd scored more goals. Although you''ve totally missed the point of what I was saying and, on a side note had the audacity to say my stats were ''proven'' wrong, I was wondering, in what way were they proven wrong? I took the amount of time each player was in the SPL and compared their goals to games ratio, you then, because your agenda against Hooper, only considered part of the statistics from a point in time. Again I would ask you to read the original post because I don''t know how anyone can get that upset over someone saying Hooper will be great in this league and then manipulate stats to fit their prejudices..its crazy.[/quote] I''m not surprised it''s hard for you to understand why it''s mentally incompetent to compare 1 player playing games over a span of 6 year when he''s 16-22 with another player who only played in the same league for 3 years when he was 22-24. If you want to do that, let''s add up Hooper''s goals from the time he was 16-22 and compare them with Boyds. I apparently was wrong and being that stupid would be a remarkable achievement that you will never be smart enough to reach.

[quote user="mrs miggins"]*FACEPALM* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bobp5OHVsWY I don''t think there''s any point responding to you in any different way, stupidity mixed with aggression, fantastic.[/quote] You might not want to talk about intelligence. You were proven statistically wrong. Tell me how great Boyd was once he left Scotland. How did Jerome do other than 1 year in the Championship. You may have an IQ of 10, I can get how you don''t understand.

Proven goalscorer in this league based on that 1 year...

Cameron Jerome had 1 season the Championship where he scored 18 goals... I''m sure he repeated that the other years he was in the Championship, right?????

Again, type 28 less games 11 less goals from the ages of 22-24 for Boyd.

[quote user="mrs miggins"]who''s player A, who''s player B...C, D... SPL in basic terms- league games Hooper = 95 games - 63 goals Miller = 191 games - 76 goals Boyd = 342 games - 189 goals But aside from the facts (showing Hooper goal to games ratio is so much better than the other two), your missing the point that Hooper scored 19 goals in just 35 games in an average scunthorpe team in the championship (the league we''re in now), whereas our hero Grant Holt scored just 21 in in 45 games and we finished 2nd. You understand right? You see how he could actually be half decent in this team?[/quote] You seriously can''t be this stupid... Boyd played the majority of those games from 16-22... I already gave you the stats when they were the same age. Boyd played 18 less games than Hooper in that span and scored 11 less goals. Try to figure it out moron. YOU CAN''T COMPARE SOMEONE THAT IS 16-22 WITH SOMEONE WHO WAS 22-24

As well as there have been numerous people who HAD MORE SUCCESS THAN HOOPER that once they left absolutely failed, yet DID BETTER IN THE SPL THAN EVEN HOOPER.

Success in the SPL means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.

27 less games, 11 less goals... Yeah...

If you want player A 22-24 here you go: 19 games 15 goals 17 games 17 goals 32 games 20 goals. 18 less games, 11 less goals... Worse team.

3 consecutive seasons: Player A: 24-26 32 games 20 goals 28 games 14 goals 35 games 27 goals player B 22-24 26 games 20 goals 37 games 24 goals 32 games 19goals Seems pretty much exactly comparable 1 scored 3 more goals. I mean player A also really tore up the Championship when he was in it too... ;eye roll:

[quote user="mrs miggins"]Yeah its on celtic chat forum. When we were about to sign him in january I looked at the reaction from them, they said at the time that he was the second best striker they''ve ever had and should go for about £15m and no less. When he stayed at Celtic until the end of the season and rumours started going round again, even though the celtic fans said they knew hooper wanted to leave in those last few months they still said he was the second best striker they''ve had behind larsson. Although I know its a football forum and individuals have strange ideas sometimes, the reason why I mention this is because it seems like a unanimous decision of vote if you will, they love him over there for all his goals. I''m sure in terms of attitude perhaps (like I was saying that he didn''t look like himself since january of that year), but in terms of ability, they all seemed to say that he was the second best striker they''ve ever had. However, this was about a player who was perhaps going to leave, emotions are high, especially for a team who know they can''t replace with better quality. But just passing on what i read from their forum at the time, everyone wanted him to stay unless they got $hitloads for him.[/quote] You are really quite special... because morons think he should have been sold for 15 million he''s great... You get that idiots on THIS BOARD, think NATHAN REDMOND should be sold for 15 mill right??? Truly he''s one of the greatest wide players Norwich have ever had.

[quote user="mrs miggins"]I think people are underrating hooper, especially in this league. Celtic fans regard him as the second best striker they''ve ever had, next to H. Larsson, the third best being way behind them. Although its the SPL, the fact that he did so well compared to everyone else (and compared to other celtic strikers) and that everyone in scotland realised he was a cut above everyone else surely means he''s got the potential to go to the next level. He''s proved he''s one of the greatest strikers ever in the SPL, he''s proved that he can blitz the championship, he wants prove now he can do it in the prem, especially after playing in a relegated hughton team. If we keep hold of him, I think we''ll get promoted. The only real goalscorer we have is grabban, if he gets injured or hits a brick wall, then who have we got thats a natural goalscorer if its not Hooper? Lafferty -no, Jerome -no. He''ll be great this season, but from what i''ve heard, it doesn''t look like he''ll be here which is very unfortunate.[/quote] uhhmmmm are Kris Boyd and Kenny Miller SPL legends too? Because each of them did better than Hooper on worse teams. Seriously, my god the stupidity.