horsefly

You are a very sad man if this retarded absurdity is all you can come up with. Comment necessary.

Yet another blatant lie for which you have not the slightest evidence. And BTW, despite your obvious desire that more EU citizens die from Covid, the fact remains that the UK has the highest total of deaths of any European nation. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_pandemic_by_country_and_territory

Oh dear! Another epic fail from bird-brain. Not only is your solitary sentence in defiance of English grammar and spelling, it also demonstrates yet again that you struggle to understand even the most basic expressions. I will repeat what Macron said one last time: Asked whether a Leave or Remain vote in France could have ended with the same result, Mr Macron told the BBC's Andrew Marr Show: "Yes, probably. Probably in a similar context. But our context was very different so I don't want to take any bets." Is it the fact that his comment contains a "disguised" conditional that taxes your tiny brain beyond its miniscule capacity? Perhaps it didn't help that Macron was speaking rather clumsily in a second language? Either way it ought to be clear to all but the severely challenged that the phrase, "Yes probably. Probably in a similar context. But our context was very different..." is to be understood as claiming something like, "If we had a similar situation to the UK the French would probably vote for brexit too, BUT we (French) have a very different context, so who knows". Every opinion poll of the French population's attitude to remaining in the EU shows them in favour of doing so. I note you have not come forward with a poll saying the contrary despite your lie that I am wrong about this FACT. Learn to read things properly, and with at least some degree of critical self-awareness. It would save you making such an embarrassment of yourself on a daily basis. .

Exactly the same over-simplistic correlation of stats presented as if that is where analysis begins and ends. As I have said repeatedly stats are simply stats, and any correlations between stats are merely the starting point for an analysis which involves investigation through a variety of social research methods. For example, your blunt correlation of numbers of arrests with numbers of shootings is strikingly superficial. Before one even begins investigating such a correlation there are questions to ask about why black people are more likely to be arrested for certain "offences" than white people (e.g. possession of small amounts of drugs). However, I realise through past experience of your posts that I'm wasting my time expecting you to consider such things.

Breaking news! The Tory Party central office did pay for the refurbishment of the no.10 flat. It now describes that as a loan to Johnson. Johnson has broken the ministerial code by not declaring that fact. https://www.itv.com/news/2021-04-26/robert-peston-exclusive-tory-party-gave-loan-to-boris-johnson-for-downing-street-refurbishment

And while I'm on the subject of the trade deal with Australia, perhaps the brexiteers on here would like to watch the following clip then remind us what they said about our trade deficit with the EU: Just like the trade deal with Japan, Truss and her supporters (forgive the pun) claim what a fantastic deal she has done only for reality to prove we've been shafted again by a foreign power. Any school kid could tell you this is what happens when you negotiate from a position of painfully obvious weakness. So while the Aussies flood our markets with cheap tariff-free-hormone-saturated beef, our beef farmers will have lost not only the EU market but their home market too; wonderful work Liz. Brexit is turning the UK into a third-rate trading nation. Next we'll be joining the CPTPP without any say whatsoever in their rules of business. I guess feeble paupers have to be grateful for any crumbs they can sweep from the floor.

Interestingly the figure of £500m is precisely the sum that government "experts" predict as the improvement in GDP as a result of Truss' "fantastic" deal with the Aussies (https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/brussels-chaos-uk-tells-eu-it-s-all-set-for-wto-rules-as-australia-deal-gives-huge-boost/ar-BB1g0FTv?ocid=msedgntp). So, one months loss of trade due to brexit will be offset by a year's trade with Australia, on the big assumption that a deal turns out to be as "good" as claimed. She had better radio Boris, "I'm going to need a bigger deal".

Ok, find me a poll that says the French public would vote leave.

Seems Michael ( coke-head) Gove has just misled parliament. He said he was "in the room with Johnson" and heard him say nothing of the sort. Robert Peston has just said on LBC that Gove was not in the room where those words were allegedly shouted.

Probably the only person with a face more purple than Jools.

Now finish the complete phrase you moron "... Probably in a similar context. But our context was very different so I don't want to take any bets." Add to this the FACT that all the polls in France still show that the public are in favour of remaining in the EU. You're worse than bloo*dy johnson when it comes to lying (by which I mean you're both liars but you're worse at it).

Thanks for proving my point you fool.

Well at least they're a very small step up from the embarrassing QAnon bollox that he used to post on the Trump thread. Not much though, anything more taxing would scatter his remaining brain cells more randomly than a pool break.

FFS you are an idiot. You just proved again you don't read beyond the headlines. YET AGAIN this article contains the quote I have already posted: Asked whether a Leave or Remain vote in France could have ended with the same result, Mr Macron told the BBC's Andrew Marr Show: "Yes, probably. Probably in a similar context. But our context was very different so I don't want to take any bets." Just what is it about the English language that you find such a struggle. Also, a FACT is something that is true. The French have not "voted out" so it is NOT a fact you buffoon.

No! My complaint was with the contradiction in your claim that others peddle simplistic answers when that is precisely what you are doing with the bare statement of that stat. Statistics are just that, statistics. Their relevance is only determined by the critical analysis in which they are explained and utilised. Here is an example of a non-simplistic analysis of the statistics: https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/shootings-by-police-in-the-united-states-of-america-by-race-gender-and-age.html In the meantime perhaps you might consider whether this belligerent (possibly drunk) police officer would have behaved this way towards a white person https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/viral-video-shows-police-officer-racially-profiling-black-man-at-diner/ar-BB1g3TZt?ocid=msedgntp

Haha! If they cut the wages bill a bit they might be able to afford one of these:

Indeed! no one better to quote when it's the case that the quote itself is pertinent to the issue, as this one so clearly is.

Let's not forget one of the other poor victims of Johnson's ill-informed bumbling. The Iranian government used Johnson's egregious false claims about Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe as the pretext for her first 5-year sentence. https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/courts/iran-sentences-nazanin-zaghari-ratcliffe-to-another-year-in-jail/ar-BB1g3YOG?ocid=msedgntp

Haha! It's his age, but don't worry, he's in a safe space.

I'll get your nursey to come round and clean it up after she's finished emptying your diaper. Now stop being so grumpy, the gruel round should be due any time now. Meanwhile, you can lick your own face, that taste of boiled gammon should sustain you for a while.

He certainly sports their combined weight and stupidity.

And how many of your RWNJs' party that you donate to will get a seat? What's it called now UKIP, the Brexit Party, Nige's Pension Fund Party????

The man who was sacked from the Times for lying. The man who was sacked from the Tory front bench for lying. What's that famous saying, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me." Seems you're living up to your name Jools, or should I say "Fools".

How very sad! In a desperate attempt to sound intelligent you quote a piece of Shakespeare that is about the futility of all human life. You'll need to go back on line to nick something that might actually be passingly appropriate.