£3.5m spent on signings and wages ?

[Peter 0]

Neil Warnock says on SUFC website Norwich have spent £3.5m on new signings and salaries.

£1.2m on new signings, £400k on loan signings. That leaves salaries for Huckerby McKenzie and Svensson of £1.9m, is Hucks still on £20k per week ?

[jon francis 0]

Peter hucks wages are being split between delia smith, the club and a diss businessman called carl moore. Carl is a friend of mine and he is paying 6 grand a week which means so therefore is delia and so are the club. This means they are 18 grand per week.

[Mook 0]

Holy rich-guy Batman. That''s ridiculous.

So all those people that thought it was completely natural that we signed Hucks, think again how much effort has gone into this.

[Lurd 0]

Could it be that warnock is exaggerating somewhat? Probably bitter he couldn''t sign Hucks..

[0peteddMMyyyy0Falseen-USTrue 0]

£18,000 grand per week, well its a lot, but on todays evidence well worth it, explains why only 2 1/2 year contract, noone can deny Deals puts her money where her mouth is.

One thing that concerns me if Easton isn''t out of contract this summer, who gave him a 4 year contract or was it a 5 year contract or even longer. Same goes for Rivers. Nigel answers on a postcard.

[no1canary 0]

I very much doubt that we spent £3.5m on players and Hucks is on £18''000 a week. Neil Warnock doesn''t know Norwich''s financial business it was just a guess like we all guess how much Hucks is on. I would say he''s on £15''000 tops plus bonuses and wage rise if we go up.
I saw the other day somewhere, might have been on the Norwich site about the ticket prices that it was about £2m we spent alltogether.

[Hcuk 0]

I heard that City were paying Hux £12k a week and Man City are paying him £8k a week so they didn''t have pay him the £1.5m they owed him for the rest of his contract.