Injury worries!

[Canaries Canary 0]

http://new.pinkun.com/content/ncfc/story.aspx?brand=PINKUNOnline&category=Norwich&tBrand=PinkUnOnline&tCategory=Norwich&itemid=NOED26%20Oct%202006%2012%3A03%3A18%3A960Team for Saturday?

[Rudolph Hucker 0]

No problems! In comes a 4-4-2 with Hucks up front alongside Dion and Eagle on the left.

Ashdown is back in and I wonder if Gally is that bad?

[Northern Canary 0]

Hucks and Dion upfront in a 442 could work quite effectively as Hucks worked very well next to Roberts a few years ago.

[sheded 0]

Whats interesting,  is that  all the injuries  to the players  have been described  , yet  Hucks injury [ to my knowledge ]  hasn`t been  specified !    I wonder why ?   could it be that   he`s been allowed to play  far too long when he`s been carrying  a groin injury ?  just a thought  .....

 

[mbncfc 1]

[quote user="sheded"]

Whats interesting,  is that  all the injuries  to the players  have been described  , yet  Hucks injury [ to my knowledge ]  hasn`t been  specified !    I wonder why ?   could it be that   he`s been allowed to play  far too long when he`s been carrying  a groin injury ?  just a thought  .....

 

[/quote]

It''s said in the press all week that Huck''s has a back injury.

[sheded 0]

[quote user="mbncfc"][quote user="sheded"]

Whats interesting,  is that  all the injuries  to the players  have been described  , yet  Hucks injury [ to my knowledge ]  hasn`t been  specified !    I wonder why ?   could it be that   he`s been allowed to play  far too long when he`s been carrying  a groin injury ?  just a thought  .....

 

[/quote]

It''s said in the press all week that Huck''s has a back injury.

[/quote]

Remind me to buy a paper now and again !  [:$]

[a1canary 0]

Why are we talking about playing hucks with dion when he is one of the injuries in question?!

We need to bite the huckerby-less bullet - go with a traditional 4-4-2

as suggested, Eagle must continue to be blooded down the left after his

impressive showing at Vale. He''s not going to get a chance whenever

hucks is fit after all.

Up front it would ordinarily be a great opportunity to put WLY in his

preferred position alongside dion but his antics against Cardiff have

put paid to that. So it has to be Jarvis again. It''s his favoured

position as well and i still think he deserves his chance. He hasn''t

had the chance to flourish in his natural position in the senior team

yet because NW alway stuck him on the wing when he did use him.

I definitely think we should rest Safri - we''ve tried playing him with

his dodgy groin before and we all know what that resulted in. Let''s

stick Rossi Jarvis in there holding for Dickson. Can''t see it

happening, he''ll probably go with Robinson but at least he could be on

the bench.

[mbncfc 1]

[quote user="sheded"][quote user="mbncfc"][quote user="sheded"]

Whats interesting,  is that  all the injuries  to the players  have been described  , yet  Hucks injury [ to my knowledge ]  hasn`t been  specified !    I wonder why ?   could it be that   he`s been allowed to play  far too long when he`s been carrying  a groin injury ?  just a thought  .....

 

[/quote]

It''s said in the press all week that Huck''s has a back injury.

[/quote]

Remind me to buy a paper now and again !  [:$]

[/quote]

all good my man [:D]

[7rew 0]

I would play this team:

                    Ashdown

Colin - Docherty - Shackell - Drury

Croft -    Etuhu    -  _Kid2_  - Eagle

              Dublin   -  _Kid1_

Bench being: Camp, Robinson, Fleming,  _Kid1_sub, _Kid2_sub

with

_Kid1_, _Kid1_sub

             being

RyanJ and Henderson (Isn''t he actually a striker - he''s an awful winger)

_Kid2_, _Kid2_sub

             being from Rossi J, Spillane, Halliday and Fisk - whichever is best in

midfield starts

           

           

   (don''t watch reserves much but have heard they are mostly

defenders)