debbie does norwich 13 Posted April 7 Well, not the goal decision itself. The MOTD pundits assessment of it. Maybe my memory is failing me but I thought the pundits supported the decision when we had a similar goal chalked off with Cantwell loitering in front of the Leicester goalkeeper. Back in our premiership days obviously. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thirsty Lizard 3,168 Posted April 7 Was going to start a thread about this. It's the most ridiculous rule in football. It was Kenny's header against Leicester which was ridiculously ruled out because Cantwell was supposedly in Schmeichel's line of vision - even though Schmeichel (like the West Ham keeper yesterday) wasn't going to save it in a million years. 6.56 to 7.43 here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Well b back 3,230 Posted April 7 That’s right they did. Wolves however ( as much as I dislike them ) get some ridiculous decisions against them. It will be interesting to see how much Gary O’Neill gets fined and how long his ban is for telling it the way it is. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sufyellow 222 Posted April 7 2 hours ago, debbie does norwich said: Well, not the goal decision itself. The MOTD pundits assessment of it. Maybe my memory is failing me but I thought the pundits supported the decision when we had a similar goal chalked off with Cantwell loitering in front of the Leicester goalkeeper. Back in our premiership days obviously. Totally agree , it would be interesting to go back and compare their reactions. But I felt it was totally different to the Kenny goal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ulfotto 640 Posted April 7 The big difference is the Leicester goalkeeper’s over the top reaction. Although it’s forgotten now we got quite a lot of ridiculous decisions go against us in that season. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
debbie does norwich 13 Posted April 7 5 hours ago, Ulfotto said: The big difference is the Leicester goalkeeper’s over the top reaction. Although it’s forgotten now we got quite a lot of ridiculous decisions go against us in that season. As has been said, it would be interesting to go back to see their reaction but I'm guessing the big difference was that it was Leicester and I'm guessing Saint Gary was in the chair. Note: I do actually like Gary but dissed him here just to make the point Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Creedence Clearwater Couto 1,288 Posted April 7 (edited) Maddison just got away with one.. how was that not looked at? Because it’s Forest! Edited April 7 by Creedence Clearwater Couto Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Walcombe canary 69 Posted April 8 VAR is shocking. Get rid of it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thirsty Lizard 3,168 Posted April 8 9 hours ago, Walcombe canary said: VAR is shocking. Get rid of it In this particular instance it isn't VAR which is the problem - it's the actual rule itself which is just plain ridiculous. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
