Barclaybred

[quote user="Matt Juler"]I spoke to the club shop on Saturday and it''s due out "in a couple of weeks".  [/quote] Been told its coming out late as its got extras of pre season..and its put back to Augest the 6th..They also told me that keep dealing with all these enquires is just slowing them down,and would appreciate if everyone was patiant and not to contact the club about this or mention it again on any message board.... Now that should secure my copy and make sure its not sold out when i pop in to get it in a ....time

Everton fans all seem to rate him highly so im not gonna say he is worse than frasier until after 10 matches or so ...I posted the comments of evertonians earlier,and tried to do the same with motherwell,but that site wont let me copy!? ..Which again they are full of high praise!

[quote user="jas the barclay king"][quote user="Barclaybred"] [quote user="kdncfc"]I think the guy on wrath who posted about this potential takeover has got things right in the past. [/quote] Confirmed today! Holahoop will be leaving in January. My source is 100% official. The 2010 City calender doesn''t have him involved, gutted! Posted By: Great Barrier Teeth on December 5th 2009 at 17:34:13 Hmmmm 100% ..Now even if he has `guessed` a few in the past correctly,to state "He will be leaving" and"100% official" 100% official!!!!!! Now my 7 /100 of this being true has dipped to 3 [/quote] and the club will wait 6 months to cash in on a player they could sell tommorow.... b******s! [/quote] Jas you have missnderstood mate..This was a copy of a previous post by the great fortune teller,great barrier teeth,back in dec! ..Not a post stating hoolie will be moving next jan! lol

The views below are submitted by registered users of evertonfc.com and do not necessarily reflect the views of Everton Football Club. david buchanan Its a shame to see john go because he could of bin 1 for the future for the blues but good luck at Norwich John , it will will be good to see u back in the prem sometime Report comment Monday 5th Jul 2010 11:28 Agree with david? + 1 Syl Cordis All the best for the future John, hope your career goes from strenghth to strenghth and in the not to distant future we hope to see you back at Goodison park once again.................... Report comment Monday 5th Jul 2010 11:28 Agree with Syl? 0 Drew Shortis Shame to see a good young keeper leaving the club, but with Tim and Jan in front of him his playing chances would have been limited. Best of luck at Norwich. Hopefully we will see you back in the Premier League with them one day. The new Bryan Gunn perhaps? Report comment Monday 5th Jul 2010 11:21 Agree with Drew? + 1 Gerasimos Konstantopoulos Good luck John! Report comment Monday 5th Jul 2010 11:20 Agree with Gerasimos? + 1 Tom Mc Andrew We shall meet again! Report comment Monday 5th Jul 2010 10:55 Agree with Tom? + 3 Kieron Brown Good luck for the future John. Report comment Monday 5th Jul 2010 10:51 Agree

[quote user="Barclaybred"] [quote user="CJ"]Well that means Fraser Forster is going elsewhere can not believe Ruddy would want to come here to play second string and he would know he would if Forster here. I have to say totally gutted as I rated Forster very highly certainly would have been best in Champoinship. Sorry I really rate the SPL as it is simply a two horse race every year and the list of other clubs Ruddy has been at do not inspire. If Forster goes to Burnley as suggested it will simply be money which as always we aint got. Lambert is needing a miracle to do anything other than survive next year in the Championship [/quote] According to Evertonians,when he stepped in,he never let them down..his trouble was always 2 good keepers in front..as a youngster,everton loaned out,and not letting any goals in against the big 2 in scotland must count in his favour!..There has been no hint of "its about the money" with forster,from us or newcastle! You really dont know anythong about football do you.. [/quote] That was meant as "anything"

[quote user="CJ"]Well that means Fraser Forster is going elsewhere can not believe Ruddy would want to come here to play second string and he would know he would if Forster here. I have to say totally gutted as I rated Forster very highly certainly would have been best in Champoinship. Sorry I really rate the SPL as it is simply a two horse race every year and the list of other clubs Ruddy has been at do not inspire. If Forster goes to Burnley as suggested it will simply be money which as always we aint got. Lambert is needing a miracle to do anything other than survive next year in the Championship [/quote] According to Evertonians,when he stepped in,he never let them down..his trouble was always 2 good keepers in front..as a youngster,everton loaned out,and not letting any goals in against the big 2 in scotland must count in his favour!..There has been no hint of "its about the money" with forster,from us or newcastle! You really dont know anythong about football do you..

[quote user="singing canary"]you say that ,the best time in citys history ,we had a couple of scottish players. gunn and fleck[/quote] 3 lungs and malky also!

John it was getting tedious,but as my original point was concerning the length we normally give,i was correct in saying 3 IS THE NORM! so not closer to 2 or 4 or any other number!!! ..Now onto the signing..As it is a long term perm signing,im more than happy as In Lambert I Trust,so he obviously thinks this guy is worth it...Now all i want is jackson and perhaps danny green,though would still be confident with what we have now to hold our own with anyone in this division..

[quote user="John"][quote user="Barclaybred"][quote user="John"][quote user="Barclaybred"][quote user="Mustachio Furioso"][quote user="Barclaybred"][quote user="Mustachio Furioso"] [quote user="Barclaybred"]...though we dont normally do 3 year contracts,its usually 2...[/quote] Surnam and Croft came in on a 3 year and Chris Martin renegotiated a 3 and a half year deal. [/quote] You obviously missed the "normally" ..There are exceptions or i would have put "always".. [/quote] Approximately a third of Lambert''s signings are on three years rather than two. A third is not "exceptional". [/quote] So two thirds of Lamberts signings are not 3 year contracts then,so surely the norm is not 3years!   [/quote] Though perhaps ***closer*** to the norm than the "2 year" or "2 year with extension" contracts, that you previously said make up the supposed "norm"? In which case you are firmly in the wrong. If not, you''re hardly "correct" in what you first said anyway. Nevertheless, regardless, they hardly seem to be an ''unusual'' occurance, so to dispel the likelihood of this rumour on the grounds of it being a 3 year contract offerred to one who is a relatively young keeper at the age of 23, is certainly odd to say the least. [/quote]What school did you go to! If there is 1/3 that are 3 years contract as he stated,and 2/3 not,then 3year contracts are not the norm! ..I wasnt dispelling the rumour or fact,i was just stating that in the past,we seemed to offer 2 year contracts more,and some with an extension..So if this rumour/fact becomes a signing then it means,imo,Lambert has massive faith in this guy[/quote] Does lead one to wonder what school you went to. [/quote] Pay attention at the back,yes that means you JOHN!! If i was paid £600 a week for 8 months and £200 a week for 4 months..would i normally being rich or poor? .. ...cmon im waiting,,, As i NORMALLY have £600 in my pocket than the FEW months i dont,i would NORMALLY be better off than not

Easy you search dodgy website rumours,pick 1 up ,turn it into your own "source" and post on here!

[quote user="John"][quote user="Barclaybred"][quote user="Mustachio Furioso"][quote user="Barclaybred"][quote user="Mustachio Furioso"] [quote user="Barclaybred"]...though we dont normally do 3 year contracts,its usually 2...[/quote] Surnam and Croft came in on a 3 year and Chris Martin renegotiated a 3 and a half year deal. [/quote] You obviously missed the "normally" ..There are exceptions or i would have put "always".. [/quote] Approximately a third of Lambert''s signings are on three years rather than two. A third is not "exceptional". [/quote] So two thirds of Lamberts signings are not 3 year contracts then,so surely the norm is not 3years!   [/quote] Though perhaps closer to the norm than the "2 year" or "2 year with extension" contracts, that you previously said make up the supposed "norm"? In which case you are firmly in the wrong. If not, you''re hardly "correct" in what you first said anyway. Nevertheless, regardless, they hardly seem to be an ''unusual'' occurance, so to dispel the likelihood of this rumour on the grounds of it being a 3 year contract offerred to one who is a relatively young keeper at the age of 23, is certainly odd to say the least. [/quote]What school did you go to! If there is 1/3 that are 3 years contract as he stated,and 2/3 not,then 3year contracts are not the norm! ..I wasnt dispelling the rumour or fact,i was just stating that in the past,we seemed to offer 2 year contracts more,and some with an extension..So if this rumour/fact becomes a signing then it means,imo,Lambert has massive faith in this guy

[quote user="kdncfc"][quote user="Barclaybred"][quote user="Barclaybred"] [quote user="kdncfc"]I think the guy on wrath who posted about this potential takeover has got things right in the past. [/quote] Confirmed today! Holahoop will be leaving in January. My source is 100% official. The 2010 City calender doesn''t have him involved, gutted! Posted By: Great Barrier Teeth on December 5th 2009 at 17:34:13 Hmmmm 100% ..Now even if he has `guessed` a few in the past correctly,to state "He will be leaving" and"100% official" 100% official!!!!!! Now my 7 /100 of this being true has dipped to 3 [/quote] Take a quick look at Great Barrier Teeth''s track record before you start worrying... Given that it includes "definite info" that we were bidding for Emile Heskey and about to appoint Iain Dowie, I wouldn''t lose too much sleep... ..Now 2/100 [/quote] If you read some more of the posts on there someone also states that he had been right in the past. [/quote] Read what i posted! i said "even though he may have guessed a few" By using DEFINATE INFO and HOOLIE HAS GONE 100% OFFICIAL,stinks of a chancer ..I havent been bothered to check though all his posts,but im sure he has hit 1 on the head now and again...

[quote user="Barclaybred"] [quote user="kdncfc"]I think the guy on wrath who posted about this potential takeover has got things right in the past. [/quote] Confirmed today! Holahoop will be leaving in January. My source is 100% official. The 2010 City calender doesn''t have him involved, gutted! Posted By: Great Barrier Teeth on December 5th 2009 at 17:34:13 Hmmmm 100% ..Now even if he has `guessed` a few in the past correctly,to state "He will be leaving" and"100% official" 100% official!!!!!! Now my 7 /100 of this being true has dipped to 3 [/quote] Take a quick look at Great Barrier Teeth''s track record before you start worrying... Given that it includes "definite info" that we were bidding for Emile Heskey and about to appoint Iain Dowie, I wouldn''t lose too much sleep... ..Now 2/100

[quote user="kdncfc"]I think the guy on wrath who posted about this potential takeover has got things right in the past. [/quote] Confirmed today! Holahoop will be leaving in January. My source is 100% official. The 2010 City calender doesn''t have him involved, gutted! Posted By: Great Barrier Teeth on December 5th 2009 at 17:34:13 Hmmmm 100% ..Now even if he has `guessed` a few in the past correctly,to state "He will be leaving" and"100% official" 100% official!!!!!! Now my 7 /100 of this being true has dipped to 3

I would guess its more of a case of investment than a takeover..

[quote user="Mustachio Furioso"][quote user="Barclaybred"][quote user="Mustachio Furioso"] [quote user="Barclaybred"]...though we dont normally do 3 year contracts,its usually 2...[/quote] Surnam and Croft came in on a 3 year and Chris Martin renegotiated a 3 and a half year deal. [/quote] You obviously missed the "normally" ..There are exceptions or i would have put "always".. [/quote] Approximately a third of Lambert''s signings are on three years rather than two. A third is not "exceptional". [/quote] So two thirds of Lamberts signings are not 3 year contracts then,so surely the norm is not 3years!  

[quote user="Barclaybred"]At what stage esthis become monotonous! ..On a scale of 1 to 100 of it actually being true,then my guess is 7,and thats only because im a optimist....But in my head im thinking another oxygen thief..[/quote] Obviously it has reached that stage as i couldnt even be bothered to spell "does" and space it from "this"!

At what stage esthis become monotonous! ..On a scale of 1 to 100 of it actually being true,then my guess is 7,and thats only because im a optimist....But in my head im thinking another oxygen thief..

[quote user="Mustachio Furioso"] [quote user="Barclaybred"]...though we dont normally do 3 year contracts,its usually 2...[/quote] Surnam and Croft came in on a 3 year and Chris Martin renegotiated a 3 and a half year deal. [/quote] You obviously missed the "normally" ..There are exceptions or i would have put "always"..

Calsworth.. When i stayed in notting hill, round friends,as a base for a couple of festivals and an illegal rave,we met a few spurs who didnt even seem to acknowledge the fact the championship existed! ...Though even my cousins/uncle etc who are eastend spammers ,never stop taking the ps outta norfolk,so its more of a London thing than one club.My dad was born and bred in london and moved here 30 odd years ago,and thinks norwich is the best place to live in the uk,so as you said not all are like that :)

I thought from yesterdays `in the knows`,it was a year long loan? ...For some reason i feel your statement carries authority so i believe you and am more than happy its a perm signing,though we dont normally do 3 year contracts,its usually 2 and on the odd occasion, with a year extension...So even more pleased..Now how about info from a reliable source on jackson please! :)

Being honest,i gave up  on the world cup when we..Couldnt even post on here till 48 hrs later!..But watched a bit of the holland match,loved it,then recorded the ghana game last night,watched it this morning and was really wanting them to win so much,it got to the stage when that pri## missed the pen, i screamed out "You f### w#####!!" at the top of my voice,and forgot all the windows were open!..Now they are out,i will watch the final,and for football`s sake,would love the dutch to win :)

[quote user="I am a Banana"]If he has a good 1st half of the season he will be gone in jan for big bucks, if he has an average start they will sell him in a years time![/quote] Havent quite got the message banana, who are you supporting in the world cup?

Lappinitup..Though i too really hate sad "look at me look at me" time wasters,who either invent crp or look on other message boards who too have these attention seekers on and regurtitate their rumours onto here, i think perhaps we are being too harsh on them! They probably feel less important in their day to day lives,and have deep inadequacies! So their little time in the spotlight,trying to make out either they are in the know,or as in this case because he has posted many failed rumours in the past,he has done it by proxy,atributing the rumour to a ,apparently successful rumour broker..Thus giving himself,for once,some credence,and if the signing does materialise,getting back some kudos from us.. I think we should allow him this for humanitarian reasons.. :) ..Good luck ncfclad, hope you are right.. :)  

Like it! And glad no pics of Hamiltion in his playing days!...What about Walkers playing days,luton i think,or an easy one is stringer as pic of him must be somewhere