Jump to content

Gamera

Members
  • Content Count

    208
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Everything posted by Gamera

  1. Pretty much the same odds Lambert was on a few days ago.
  2. That''s what I though, it''s just frustrating the whole signal issue. May just be my provider to be honest.
  3. Ah...I thought the other WIFI was general use... If any fancies PM''ing me and knows any info that would be awesome. Either that or I buy an old school personal radio I guess.
  4. Bit of a desperate plea here, altho it will only be applicable for one game. I''m getting a bit sick of not being able to have a cheeky glance at the scores due to horrific signal around and inside the ground. I appreciate I should be watching the game, but in a lull having a look is acceptable in my book. As Villa will coincide with a fairly exciting relegation/title/chamions league run in I''d quite like to keep an eye on it. Does anyone have any WIFI passwords for the various WIFI''s knocking about at the ground. I''m in the Jarrold, smack in the middle, so I think I could log into the press WIFI if I had the password. Any ideas?  
  5. Why on earth was that played out two seconds before kick off?? Whats next? The chuckle brothers leading kick it off? Can''t we let the football generate the atmosphere? Although saying that the Jarrold piped up with a "Were the Jarrold over here" last night, which turned a few heads! So it must have worked.
  6. Get in! Great save by ruddy there at the end. My heart came out of my throat I think. Well done lads.
  7. All of first rows gone down...is this the same for everyone?
  8. On second glance that "headbutt" looks ridiculous. Is howard Webb trying to even the score a little? We''d be up in arms if that was the other way round here.
  9. WAHEY!! see you later! haha, ridiculous but brilliant!!
  10. Wigan 1-0 up as well, three of our main contenders for the drop all winning. Not great, with blackburn winning as well.
  11. I would hate to see the backlash had that happened to us (the linesman nonsense) and they had scored.
  12. More shots on target than all of last game?And that refereeing/linesman nonsense was laughable.
  13. Anybody know if theres a clear little river out there? I''ve got kinda muddy waters here.
  14. [quote user="Lambert is god"]''Jack of all trades, master of none'' "sell off the dead weight" "Bare bones" "Either way I actually would have rather put all our eggs in one basket" Bored with work, I''ve been playing Spot the Hackneyed Expression on the Pink Un today. This posting, with its top-ranking cliche coefficient, wins 5 pounds. [/quote] Been in training for a new office job all day, It''s impossible to avoid!!! Didn''t want to let it slip into out of work though!
  15. Feels a bit ''Jack of all trades, master of none''..... We can set out a team for all occasions, yet that means we can''t get a settled team. I''d rather we take the risk in having no real strength in depth and more of a first team that can work on getting more solid, and have the space to potentially buy in january. The first thing I generally do in Fifa (yes I know its not real life.....) is sell off the dead weight, and buy up new better players. Strength in depth is for cups. Something were never going to need. Of course theres the risk of injurys but its a calculated risk. I already put on another thread I would have prefered the money from morrison and vaughan spent on one striker. I think strikers is our main area of too many options. Although look at the center back issues. Bare bones, and realisticly we would be looking at playing youth players. On the other hand we had no GK on the bench last game. Either way I actually would have rather put all our eggs in one basket. Although don''t ask me to start picking out names.
  16. I think to be honest we have too many strikers. I was unsure about it, but since were playing martin, I can''t see why we didn''t blow all of the money for vaughan and morrison on one ''super striker''. A 4-5 million pound striker may well have been more of a risk. But a calculated one. We would still have 5 strikers (Wilbraham included) but I feel we would have been far better off.
  17. [quote user="Gamera"]Hucks mcveigh and eadie are on there,and soon as well. I''m sure ruddys on there as well actually.[/quote] By soon I meant dion. Didn''t know about grant being a fake. That gives the impression someone took over his account, or has it always been a fake?
  18. Hucks mcveigh and eadie are on there,and soon as well. I''m sure ruddys on there as well actually.
  19. ipswich conceding at the the same time?! Amazing!
  20. Weve looked awful, I had so much hope, just feel angry! Ah well, presume we''ll sack Lambert and bring in Malky after this?
  21. Lovely, Seems id gone all the ins just not the outs, cheers.
  22. Ok, so Ruddy, Surman, Ward, Fox, Crofts, Jackson inAnd The Doc and Russell out, any clarification on this?
×
×
  • Create New...