Baldyboy 1 Posted August 29, 2012 maybe Hughton has decided he is going to play Hoolahan as a front man off Holt or Morison? A lot of us called for this last season, me included, so maybe thats his thinking? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
G 0 Posted August 29, 2012 Hopefully not because that definately isn''t his best position, he isn''t a natural goal scorer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Redders Right Foot 22 Posted August 29, 2012 not too sure, he said he was done adding to defense and midfield. but didn''t say anything about keepers or strikers, and one of the two has been taken care of today.I expect to see one come in, but that''s just me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Baldyboy 1 Posted August 29, 2012 I agree, but can he be accommodated in a 442 formation? I hope to see him every game as for me he is our most creative player, and if this is what it takes to fit him in then why not? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VMan Canary 0 Posted August 29, 2012 As I have just put on a thread regarding substitutions I was very suprised he was not used last week. I know some people feel he can be a liablity and that he does not have an engine like Howson but for those marginal games I hope Hughton gives him a chance to show that he can just give us that bit of creativity which can mean the difference between 3 points and 1. So I hope he is included even if it is just as an impact sub. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Morisons Prozac 0 Posted August 29, 2012 That is an option but Hughton has said we''re after a striker so no worries really. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Norma Stick 0 Posted August 29, 2012 I actually think that Hoolahan isn''t part of Hughton''s plans, especially with Butterfield nearing fitness. Wouldn''t surprise me if he was offloaded before 11pm Friday Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
