Irish canary 0 Posted May 13, 2009 Am I right in saying, that we let Croft go for free??!! Marshall who we payed 1 million for, go for 300,000 and appointed Gunn mangager?!!!!!!what a f**kin joke and laughing stock of a club we are!! We cant even do a bit of business and make money for the team next year losing our so called good players!!Unf*ckinbelievable!!! [:@] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ACE 0 Posted May 13, 2009 Croft would not sign a new contract.Would you rather they had broken his legs to make him sign? Of course he went for free.Marshall - undisclosed fee, so how do you know it was 300k. And how much do you reckon a keeper who gets relegated to league one in a woeful defence with glaring holes in his game is worth?Gunn - something the board can control. If you are going to moan, at least moan about something that was poor decision making rather than circumstances.[quote user="Irish canary"]Am I right in saying, that we let Croft go for free??!! Marshall who we payed 1 million for, go for 300,000 and appointed Gunn mangager?!!!!!!what a f**kin joke and laughing stock of a club we are!! We cant even do a bit of business and make money for the team next year losing our so called good players!!Unf*ckinbelievable!!! [:@][/quote] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Official Joe 0 Posted May 13, 2009 Croft was out of contract so effectively not our player to sell, but I thought we could have done a bit more bartering for Marshall (whether you like him or not). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Red Canary 0 Posted May 13, 2009 I like how suddenly news that Croft wants to leave comes out the same day as Gunn is appointed manager! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
