DDD In The Fine City 1 Posted March 13, 2009 Thats another 500k down the drain Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bogbrush 0 Posted March 13, 2009 [quote user="Belaugh Yellow"]thats one game in 30. He isnt good enough and a waste of money.In most of the games i have seen him he has looked slow disinterested and 7 in 10 passes went out of play or to an opponant. [/quote] I cited the Plymouth game as a perfect example of what I was saying. However, granted I have only seen him play 4 times although on each of those occasions he has played well and has been totally committed. IMO based upon what I have seen of him, he is a very decent player. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hog 0 Posted March 13, 2009 I for one would not shed any tears if he never played for us again, he was meant to be one of the famous Premiership inbetween players that Roeder promised but after his initial loan period he has never really delivered. He is tough and energetic without doubt but then so was Andy Hughes, both of them were a waste of money. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Binky 0 Posted March 13, 2009 When he came in on loan I was not convinced and after we signed him full time I thought he was generally poor. He (rightly IMO) got a lot of stick on here at the time as he was clearly over weight. But he has improved without doubt, he (usually) has lots of energy as a sub (remember him winning the penalty v Barnsley?) and all things being equal, few could object to him being part of the squad. I''d have him on the bench before Fotheringham. But energy and non-stop running are not enough. We have Russell for that. We need some confidence-building skill players - Gow & Hoolahan showed the benefits of that v Cardiff on Tuesday. And all things aren''t equal. If Pattison and Gunn don''t see eye to eye then I don''t want Gunn distracted by too many man-management problems right now. (Lappin showed the right attitude and caused Roeder no problems - despite everything - and I hope others do the same). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
koimatsuba 0 Posted March 13, 2009 This is so wrong, he should be in our squad, even coming on as a sub would help the team. IF we go down, and we lose Patty then we are mugs.I don''t care if people think he''s slow, fat, whatever, when he played he mostly played with flair and passion and scored 3 in 4 games.As I have said before, if Crook/Butterworth or Gunn have fell out with Patty then its NCFC loss.Newcastle thought he was good enough to take him on in the first place, yet little old Norwich think hes not worth the effort.Stupid, just plain Stupid!!!Cheers All Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mister Chops 7 Posted March 13, 2009 [quote user="Karl Pilkington"]Well according to Sky Sports we will allow him to go.I just can not understand why??? Gunns said Fozzy can go on loan, we can''t let Matty Patty (Mayonaise) leave as well?http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11688_5040594,00.html[/quote]That leaves us very short of central midfielders, assuming Fozzy''s not getting back in the side. Strange. We''d have Clingan and Russell only, and Russell''s usually 1 game away from suspension. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
city-till-i-die 7 Posted March 13, 2009 going to leeds apparently...mate told me leeds fan. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GJP 79 Posted March 13, 2009 Not a bad player Pattison. Not the greatest footballer you''ll ever see, that is for sure, but he''s got a decent range of passing on him, strikes a good ball, brave in the tackle and got a bit of pace to get around the pitch.A handy player to have in the squad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
