St.John Cooper 0 Posted October 13, 2006 The thread says it all, one of them on their own would have been a better choice. Gutted OTBC St.John Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ca 1 Posted October 13, 2006 [quote user="St.John Cooper"]The thread says it all, one of them on their own would have been a better choice. Gutted OTBC St.John[/quote] Bowen didnt want it, Peter Grant did so lets get behind him!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
First Wizard 0 Posted October 13, 2006 Sorry Angel, I''m close to destroying my membership tonight, no more the fool!. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yellow fever 0 Posted October 13, 2006 [quote user="cityangel"][quote user="St.John Cooper"] The thread says it all, one of them on their own would have been a better choice. Gutted OTBC St.John[/quote] Bowen didnt want it, Peter Grant did so lets get behind him!![/quote]for how long angel before you start to join us vs grant Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fat Barman 0 Posted October 13, 2006 Quite right, Angel, Wet Sham''s best seasons under Pardew have been since Grant became his assistant - that''s the same background as Bowen.The only difference is Grant had the misfortune to join us after the UEFA cup adventure and so isn''t revered as much for past glories. In every other respect he ticks all the same boxes as Bowen & Crook, good servants to the club, all three of them, all with experience as assistant bosses in teams which have prospered during their tenures.I too would have enjoyed seeing Bowen & Crook return, but I''m quite happy to give Peter Grant my full backing - On The Ball City! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nutty nigel 7,902 Posted October 13, 2006 [quote user="cityangel"][quote user="St.John Cooper"] The thread says it all, one of them on their own would have been a better choice. Gutted OTBC St.John[/quote] Bowen didnt want it, Peter Grant did so lets get behind him!![/quote]We all need to unite behind the new manager now!Some people were always gonna be disappointed whoever it was, more because of who it is, but that''s only because he is an unknown as far as management goes. There was disappointment when bothWalker and Worthington were appointed and they both gave us success. Peter Grant must have impressed in interviews, he must have come with good reports from the football people who advise the board. He knows the club and knows it''s limitations and as you say he wanted the job. Lets all give him a chance and see what he can do! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maverick 0 Posted October 13, 2006 I think you might find that we''ll end up with Grant and Crook instead... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Maverick 0 Posted October 13, 2006 http://www.thenest-ncfc.co.uk/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=322&mode=&order=0&thold=0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ca 1 Posted October 13, 2006 [quote user="Yellow fever"][quote user="cityangel"][quote user="St.John Cooper"] The thread says it all, one of them on their own would have been a better choice. Gutted OTBC St.John[/quote] Bowen didnt want it, Peter Grant did so lets get behind him!![/quote]for how long angel before you start to join us vs grant[/quote] I won''t be joining you anywhere Yellow Fever, I''m happy with the appointment and will be behind him 100% Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
