Branston Pickle 3,690 Posted January 21 (edited) 30 minutes ago, essex canary said: More than one newspaper has recorded 25,180. Do you believe they all got it wrong or NCFC misinformed them? Holy crap, this is a new angle for beating the club with. Fact 1: it was announced as 25800. The official site says the same. Fact 2: some outlets seem to have reported it as 25180 It is either a major conspiracy, or maybe someone keyed a figure incorrectly somewhere in the data used by the media - it happens. I don’t actually care, just reporting what was said. Get over it. Edited January 21 by Branston Pickle Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TIL 1010 4,797 Posted January 21 16 hours ago, Commonsense said: It’s what they announced at the game and posted on the big screen. Indeed they did. 25,800 and i was surprised at Block H which was given to WBA being virtually empty especially as traditionally the Baggies sell out when they come to Carrow Road. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TIL 1010 4,797 Posted January 21 3 hours ago, essex canary said: More than one newspaper has recorded 25,180. Do you believe they all got it wrong or NCFC misinformed them? Surely you can swing the fact around that the empty seats and there were hundreds of them in the away section as a stick to beat the club with instead of it being down to WBA not selling the allocation they were given or requested. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TIL 1010 4,797 Posted January 21 3 hours ago, essex canary said: Indeed. Bang on the front cover. The attention to detail of our £3 million a year SMT is shocking. Proof reading programmes before they go to print is in their remit is it ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nik Vawn 154 Posted January 21 Those of us that were there made plenty of noise though, and those that were absent missed a really good game. They’ll be back before long! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nik Vawn 154 Posted January 21 That old drum made a bit of noise too, excellent 👍 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Commonsense 650 Posted January 21 4 hours ago, essex canary said: That is true too and apparently numerous of the gaps yesterday were in the WBA section. Perhaps WBA have paid for some of those empty spaces to allow their loyal fans who want to go to do so even if they can't fill them all. Not a philosophy that NCFC is willing to follow as the approach to Liverpool next week demonstrates. So we risk choking off fans due to the greed and short-sightedness of the SMT. Do you have any evidence whatsoever for this assertion, or is it just more of the same continual whinge? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Commonsense 650 Posted January 21 (edited) 4 hours ago, essex canary said: Edited January 21 by Commonsense Repetition Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
