Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
NegativeVibes

Darryl Russell is not suspended?

Recommended Posts

I remember seeing a thread on here after the Blackpool game saying that the one negative was that Rusty was suspended for the next game, and then others said the solution would be to play Pattison in the middle and Hucks on the left. Well on a canaries.co.uk article written today "STOKE TICKETS JUST £6", it says "Where the likes of Chadwick and Darryl Russell look set to face their former side"

So is he, or isn''t he suspended?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="NegativeVibes"]

I remember seeing a thread on here after the Blackpool game saying that the one negative was that Rusty was suspended for the next game, and then others said the solution would be to play Pattison in the middle and Hucks on the left. Well on a canaries.co.uk article written today "STOKE TICKETS JUST £6", it says "Where the likes of Chadwick and Darryl Russell look set to face their former side"

So is he, or isn''t he suspended?

[/quote]Dangerously close to being positive there, Negative... [;)]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Assuming Russel isnt suspended what do we do about selection ei Hucks? I personally would leave the same starting line up and have Hucks and Croft on the bench to add the pace if its tight or we need a late goal. Who are Stokes fullbacks? Croft hasnt set the world alight this season but in terms of fresh legs off the bench, as a defender i wouldnt want to see those two comming on late!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...