colu_mike

Delia is a Ipswich Town fan through and through. Don''t trust her![:D]

Grow up, or has the fertilizer stunted your mental development? [|-)]

[quote user="Lambert is King"] [quote user="colu_mike"]You can keep talking the talk but after the FDC deductions you budgies 30 points you won''t squawking the squawk,[/quote] You really are in cloud cuckoo land. We wont even know the result for at least a month, strangely enough after next years fixtures are out. Once you see that Cowling has been leading you all a merry dance you will want him out for destroying your club. Apparently some of your fans beleive that any points we are deducted you will be given. Even if they were right 0 + 0 = 0. Have fun in league 1 with your huge support, your average gate will plummit next year with us, Leeds and Millwall promoted and Southend relegated. O dear maybe administration looming once you all realise what an idiot Cowling has been. Please come back after the result of the hearing and let us know your opinion, till then FO [/quote]   The only team that will be going into administration is Norwich City. Once your promotion is revoked, your creditors lose patience, and your 33 million pound debt comes home to roost; you''ll be in administration to slump back into League Two where you truly belong. You''ll be forever the team that came bottom of the league in 1956/7 losing 7-1 to Torquay - FACT.

[quote user="morty"][quote user="colu_mike"]I''m a smelly pirate hooker and clearly no points deduction is the only fair decision.[/quote] [Y] [/quote]   Wash your mouth out with soap, and practise saying ''thirty point deduction'', because that''ll be all you''ll be talking about for the next 10 years.

[quote user="Good Touch For A Big Man"] [quote user="colu_mike"]You budgies will get a THIRTY POINT deduction from the FDC - FACT.[/quote] I was wondering when this muppett would finally make his way over to the pinkun from the BBC 606 website. This season you have predicted that:   1. Colchester would finish above Norwich. Wrong. 2. Colchester would beat Norwich at the swamp. Wrong. 3. Norwich would lose Hoolahan and Holt in January. Wrong. 4. Norwich would''nt finish in the top two. Wrong 5. Bothroyd would be a better manager than Lambert. Wrong.   So basically I think it is fair to assume you will be wrong again Mike. So could kindly **** off and leave everyone alone. [/quote]   1. Southend would have tax problems. Correct. 2. Southend would be relegated. Correct. 3. Wycombe would be relegated. Almost there. 4. Peter Taylor would be gone by Christmas. Correct. 5. Norwich will be deducted 30 points by the FDC. I will be proved correct.   I am right about the MAJOR stuff of the clubs on my hit list to HEX.[li]

[quote user="Askounin"]I know my club has broken the Football League rules, and wronged the best club in East Anglia, so I accept we''ll be getting a thirty piont deduction. [/quote] You''re speaking a lot of sense too Askounin. [:D]   COL U RULE OK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! xD

[:#] It’s hardly surprise that your board is substandard is it really?

[quote user="Askounin"][quote user="colu_mike"]You can keep talking the talk but after the FDC deductions you budgies 30 points you won''t squawking the squawk,[/quote]Nice Pizza[/quote] WHAT?

[quote user="Lambert is King"][quote user="ron obvious"][quote user="First Wizard"][quote user="Queen B"]From Chris Goreham''s twitter: Just been sent the following statement by ncfc http://twitpic.com/1ioicy [/quote]As this was supposed to last two days, has an agreement happened?[/quote] I don''t think an agreement was likely. The tribunal was set up to hear the evidence & arrive at an independent judgement. It''s heard the relevant evidence & will consider its verdict in due course. [/quote] Look East said a while ago that the outcome is not expected for a month [/quote] The FDC are waiting until the end of the season to deduct you thirty points. It wouldn’t be good PR for the blazers, if there were loads of Norfolk kids crying on the Football League and Late Kick Off programmes, would it?

You can keep talking the talk but after the FDC deductions you budgies 30 points you won''t squawking the squawk,

You budgies will get a THIRTY POINT deduction from the FDC - FACT.

1) To what extent you support Cowling''s stance. 100% 2) What level of punishment i.e points deduction or fine you would feel vindicated and justified should City receive. 15+ points deduction 3) What your punishment FOR MY CLUB would be were you able to impose one. 45 point deduction (15 Lambert, 15 Culverhouse & 15 Karsa)

Talk is cheap; actions speak louder than words, so if your chairman really is so sure of himself let''s have this FDC hearing post-haste to sort the matter out once and for all. Why instruct your legal representation to stall proceedings?

[quote user="kick it off"][quote user="Lt.Columbo"] I have a thought. Listen to this; what if Mr Cowling is justifiably angry? You know considering that Norwich broke two league rules to tap up and induce Paul Lambert to break his contract? It''s a free country, so if the media ask RC a question he is entitled to respond. The guilty party in cases such as this are advised to keep quiet. Let the football do the talking on Saturday. After All the FA have months to ponder just how many of your points to deduct... 20... 30... [/quote] HAHA as if we will be deducted points. don''t be ridiculous. How is it tapping up when Tw*tling GAVE US PERMISSION to talk to Lambert? We didn''t make him resign, although i cant say i blame him working under Cowling. He who protests too much... he is obviously throwing accusations out in a ridiculous attempt to undermine a promotion rival, we asked permission, he said yes and then refused to let Lambert go, so Lambert handed his resignation in, as he entitled to do. Cowling is also entitled to respond to the media, no-one is forcing him to mouth off like someone raped his dog though! If I get angry about something, I dont behave like a 2 year old and throwing a tantrum. Even if it is proven his anger is justifiable, his behaviour and conduct isn''t. He is making himself and Col U look ridiculous, whereas we have maintained a dignified silence about the whole affair, Cowling needs to do the talking in the boardroom and stop being so petulant. [/quote] I think you are missing the point. Football League rules, which you agree to in return for your golden share, are subtly different from employment laws per se. 

Actually our attendances were falling as a direct result of Lambert’s dross. It’s hilarious that you think Lambert is some kind of saviour, when in reality you’d probably have the same number of points if you’d stuck with Gunn. Your season will choke like all Lambert’s managerial campaigns as your players’ bottle it like they famously did at Fulham and Charlton.

I have a thought. Listen to this; what if Mr Cowling is justifiably angry? You know considering that Norwich broke two league rules to tap up and induce Paul Lambert to break his contract? It''s a free country, so if the media ask RC a question he is entitled to respond. The guilty party in cases such as this are advised to keep quiet. Let the football do the talking on Saturday. After All the FA have months to ponder just how many of your points to deduct... 20... 30...