Robert Barnes 20 Posted October 23, 2011 Ruddy and city where brilliant the whole game but my ?????? is he should not have had to make that save in the 95 min. why we where shown that there was 3 extra min where did the 1min 30 sec over that come from sure looked like the ref was giving the pool every chance to win just my oppinion Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Legend Iwan 30 Posted October 23, 2011 The two substitutions that came on would add at least another minute. Also that is only the minimum amount of extra time the referee has to play. If he deems anything else happens in extra time then he can extend it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hoolahans Ped 0 Posted October 23, 2011 I would assume it was for stoppages in play that amounted to 1 minute 30 seconds... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted October 23, 2011 There seemed to be some mix up about the amount of added time. I was listening to Goreham and Gunn over the TV - the TV had "+3" next to the clock (I don''t think the board was shown) but Goreham said it was 4. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
William Darby 0 Posted October 23, 2011 It was 4 but we played 4.30. Ruddy''s save actually also saved the ref from getting serious grief imo. As it stand he had a pretty good game. If we''d have lost during the extra 30 secs the ref would''ve been a total tosspot FACT Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
