why chop and change the team???

[lucky green trainers 0]

roeder and players have been saying if we produce level of stoke performance we''ll be ok - i felt that was fair comment.  so why then didn''t roedy start with the same side???  does reody know his best side??? else why praise the perfromance, then change the team that produced it???he''s changed it, and its not come off.  relegation style defending hasn''t helped, confidence is draining - as you''d expect if we keep losing.we need to be playing our best team, week in, week out.  makes perfect sense to me - cos at some point, you will get a result and start to turn.  theres no consistency - the meddling has to stop.  pick your best team glen and stick to it....simple as.colchester is as important as luton was last season, make no mistake....

[Trent Canary 0]

I think he doesnt know the best time. To be honest I dont know the best team either. But then I dont see them day in day out

[Buncey 1]

Would like to see a reply from kick it off.

[colneycanary 0]

Silly question! We have only won 1 in 8. We are struggling to score goals and even though the performance against stoke was better than we have been playing, we still lost and failed to score. Would of been a good 0-0 draw but Shackell''s poor form has let the whole team down.

[lucky green trainers 0]

[quote user="colneycanary"]Silly question! We have only won 1 in 8. We are struggling to score goals and even though the performance against stoke was better than we have been playing, we still lost and failed to score. Would of been a good 0-0 draw but Shackell''s poor form has let the whole team down.[/quote]0-0 draw??? doubt it colney - sheff utd had missed 2 sitters in the first half already.  we were riding our luck imo.  sure - i''d have loved 0-0 - but wouldn''t this have been more likely if we''d kept it tight?  certainly, we were tight against stoke - how many chances did they create on tues nite??? jack!!!  the same defensive formation would''ve been the sensible option imo - bringing back a familiar  back line would''ve served us well - as in semmy, doc, shax and  mo.   we only just failed against stoke, missing 2 simple chances.  it was close make, mistake.  its crystal clear, we didn''t get the same level of performance yesterday, as we did on tuesday.agreed that shax is making unforced errors - but again, he was in excellent form until dropped unnecessarily to make way for pearce.  dropping players at the top of their game - and then trying to bring them back 2 weeks later doesn''t always work - cos mentally some can;t cope and lose confidence.  its clear shax is a confidence player - he looked shot to bits under grant in the autumn, but has bounced back well under roeder until of late.this is my idea of city''s best side:                                marshallsemmy   doc                        shax         mocroft      fozzy                        russell      plastic                evans                  curo

if we''re at home, or need attacking option, the hucks starts instead of plastic.