Buzz Killington 0 Posted February 14, 2014 I''m not really one for what ifs, or if onlys, but I was chatting to a fellow city fan the other day, and he was strongly of the opinion that had van Wolfsinkle not had the ball snatched from him for the pen against Villa, and he''d scored, our season would be entirely different. I thought this was a bit harsh on snodgrass myself, but does anyone think he has a point? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gingerpele 0 Posted February 14, 2014 Yes.But there are so many moments, some big and some small that happen on and off the pitch that could have changed a lot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NC 1 Posted February 14, 2014 I know exactly what you mean. I''m not one for finger pointing and holding grudges but am finding it really hard to shake the feeling that Snodders greed/hunger cost us big there! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vlad666 207 Posted February 14, 2014 Snodgrass has been poor this season with his performances, attitude and play acting. I also think we look a better and more balanced side without him playing. Having said that I don''t think that one incident shaped our season. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
