gsr600 0 Posted August 25, 2009 listnening to canary call last night i couldnt help but here some people talk about hoolahan, i have to admit i agree that hoolahan isnt any good on the left and we tend to lose shape with him in the side but i was thinking i think hes the sort of player we need to give freedom to roam to, i liked lappin on saturday hes a much better left midfielder then hoolahan but hoolahan i think is best suited to the lampard role, attacking freely behind the front two ie mcviegh hughes lappin hoolahan holt mcdonaldwe all know hoolahan is a gifted attacking player but his best role isnt providing cross thats lappins speciatlitywat do you reckon would you be happy seeing alnwick/ruddsemmy spillane askou drurymcviegh hughes/adeyemi lappin smith/hoolahan holt mcdonaldplay a more attacking role in the game Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yobocop 1,439 Posted August 25, 2009 I stopped reading at behind the front two...we MUST play 4-4-2 in this division to stand a chance, if we go 3 in midfield with one in a free role we will be over-run and lose the midfield battle.Back to basics which means no place for Hoolahan, I''ve never rated him apart from maybe 3 games anyway. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stephen Hawkings Football Boots 0 Posted August 25, 2009 I think hoolahan is an intelligent player, he seemed to be the only player tracking the runs last night. whalley and otsemobor either both went to the ball or both left it. The only problem with hoolahan is he tries to put a foot in every time and players just go past too easy. I know he''s not a defender but we need to play someone on the left midfield who can help out the left back until we stop leaking goals. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
