cypruscanary

Well I hoped the goal attempts might improve in the second half but they didnt, Norwich 2 attempts in 90 mins and Sunderland 12, I think Norwich were lucky to get none.

Norwich 60% of possession and only one shot on goal, Sunderland 40% and six shots, hope i am wrong law of averages one of them will go in eventually. Somebody tell em you have to shoot to score, lot of good if you have all the possession and lose 1-0, lets hope it changes, perhaps they are just trying to bore Sunderland to sleep and sneak one.

Looking at the statistics for Sunday Norwich had 51% of the play and 9 shots at goal, Ipswich 49% and 23 shots at goal, it seems that when City have the ball they havent a clue what to do with it, the midfield is crying out for a player with a football brain, who can direct operations, can pass 10 yards to a player with the same colour shirt , reads a game, whats the point hoofing a ball 12 feet in the air to a guy whos 5''6''''''. work to get the ball within shooting range, if you dont shoot at goal you dont score, strange but true, doesnt take rocket science.Hopefully the Manager will put this straight in January, if allowed, otherwise they be will staring relegation in the face, the luck they have had in recent matches finally ran out, when thay won games they shouldnt have,to show up a really bad team . Not the Mangers fault he can only work with what he has got, which isnt a lot, I dont envy him.

Just an idea the board might come up with,would be cheap, keep Hunter till the end of the season, hopefully we might just stay up, then instead of offering Huckerby a new contract make him Manager.[:O]

Well First Post so here goes,  If no new manager is in place, will be interesting to see what team selection is like, usual faces or some youngsters brought in, also what tactics are used, that will tell how much influence Hunter actually had, whether it was more over the first few games and less over the last 5.Will be interesting to watch even from sunny Cyprus.