Jump to content

kick it off

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    10,436

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

Posts posted by kick it off

  2. Posted

    [quote user="ricardo"]I think some people are far too sensitive. It''s a bloody internet forum and if you feel bullied on here God knows how you''d act if it was real life. Remember, nobody forces you to reply to a facetious remark Just let it go, it''s not that big a deal. [/quote]
    Ricardo, you talk more sense than anyone on this forum imo. Spt on. If people are feeling hurt and aggrieved by comments on the messageboard, then I suggest they venture into the real world once in a while, or if they insist upon living on the internet, then do some reading into the lives of people in the Democratic Republic of Congo, or Palestine, or Sierra Leone, and educate themselves on what it''s actually like to have a hard life, and stop being such insufferably melodramatic chiuldren. 
    Or just stop posting self-aggrandizing, attention seeking b**locks and learn to express themselves in a coherent fashion that gets their point across without the hyper-emotional nonsense that annoys people.... 
    It''s a messageboard FFS - if you feel bullied on here, chances are you''ve brought it on yourself and deserve it, or you just need to man up and stop being so emotionally involved and fragile over a bloody forum.

  3. Posted

    Back on topic, I got a contract package with unlimited data on it for the very reason that to exploit the full potential of smartphones, you need a comprehensive data package so you don''t end up with exorbitant bills, so Radio app is not that useful for me, although I do tune in to the Twunts on canary call from time to time on the way back from away games.

  4. Posted

    [quote user="Herman "]Some of us only have smartphones to use and watching anything on them for a long time is terribly uncomfortable. And bloody expensive. That is why a radio app might have been useful.[/quote]
    Yeah I guess so. I always make sure Im in to watch the games on a stream if im not going (which is pretty often at the moment cuz it''s too damn expensive for us, especially when you factor in petrol costs (I live North of Derby) and there being very few midlands games this year due to Wolves, Bham being relegated (albeit Bham has been a couple of years now) and Villa being on the day I moved house (took a break and went to the in-laws to make sure I could watch though!!)

  5. Posted

    [quote user="The Young One"]Any decent manager at 60mins would have played 2 up front, Fulham were there for the taking it was obvious to most of our supporters, Lambert would have gone for it, but the Hoots decides lets get the point, what a joke. Boy I,m losing my interest in NCFC .[/quote]
    I see what you''re saying, but Hughton did go 2 up top when he put Jacko on for E Bennett in the 76th. Not early enough, but to say he settled for a point when he went to 442 with 15 to go and then made another attacking sub when he put Kamara on for Becchio with 5 left is a bit weird.

  6. Posted

    [quote user="Stig"]It works like it does if you try and listen on the internet, the show isn''t available. I''ve tried it... you still get canary call and the pre-show... but the game is off limits.[/quote]
    Yep this is 100% correct.
    I dont see why others were proclaiming it as good news anyway, would they really rather listen to R Snorefolk commentary than watch the games on streams? Weird if so.

  9. Posted

    [quote user="Wiz"]

    Yes of course I will Pablo, but it''ll take more than 1 game for me to do so, 6 or 7 great performances at least.

    [/quote]
    And then you''ll repeat the cycle of being a miserable tw@ who moans for the sake of moaning about anything and everything else. You''re actually like a parody.

  13. Posted

    [quote user="Mister Chops"]Or Dignitas, of course.[/quote]
    I did raise that one once before Chopsy, and Wiz flipped out, accusing me of "wishing him dead". He clearly doesn''t understand the humour in comments such as these so I fear we''ll see a similar venting of misplaced outrage and nonsense seeing as he is back in full on emo mode. 
    I honestly think Wiz has some serious mental health issues that he needs to see a GP about. I''m not joking either. I can think of two serious mental illnesses which Wiz''s comments on here make me feel he is at risk of.

  15. Posted

    Im looking forward to seeing Kei play. Was reading an article earlier that noted he has been responsible (either scoring or getting the assist) in 45% of Kansas City''s goals in 2 of the last 3 seasons. They were saying that KC are almost entirely dependent on him and their whole game plan is give the ball to Kei and let him run at the defence. 
    That to me, sounds like something we dont currently have. Pilks will run at his man, and so will Snoddy, but they don''t possess enough pace to do it consistently and terrify defenders with the threat of it. Jacko possesses the pace to do it but it''s not really his game. Having someone to run at players the way Hucks used to would be a big asset and add a dimension we don''t have atm.

  16. Posted

    [quote user="Gnasher"]Regardless of your opinion on Kane we now have only 3 strikers (Kamara has played as a winger for the last 3 seasons). Already thought we were one short, definitely are now.[/quote]
    True, I share your concern here. Makes me wonder if Hughton is going to start blooding some of the kids once safety is secured?

  17. Posted

    [quote user="Huckerbys Boots - Matt"]Still trying to figure out how Leeds obtained an additional £200,000 as part of the deal.

    How is Becchio''s value greater than Morison''s? A striker who''s scored goals in the prem, where Becchio hasnt.

    Plus the fact the Becchio handed in a transfer request so was always going.[/quote]
    19 goals so far this season vs 2 goals so far this season. 200k extra is a bargain imo.

  18. Posted

    [quote user="Green and White"]Yeah i''m a celtic fan, not trying to hide it. There was no need to spit the dummy out just because your club couldn''t sign a player, childish.[/quote]
    Says the bloke who has apparently come on a Norwich forum specifically to gloat and antagonise that we didn''t get Hooper? Pot kettle black on the childish front there pal.
    Btw, for the record, it would have been nice to get him in but most fans with an ounce of common sense know he''s never worth more than 5mill maximum.

  20. Posted

    [quote user="ABC A Basingstoke Canary"]

    The kind of money being discussed is obscene!

     

    It is all Celtic hype

     

    Solution would be to keep "stum" until 10:30 - then offer a "take it or leave it" offer along the lines of what we 1st offered

    Celtic then have a problem - do they cash in now or do they see their attempt at producing a bidding war back fire?

     

    In all honesty, I really don''t think this deal should continue

    [/quote]
    They rejected it when they had time to replace him, they have no need to sell, why on earth would they not dismiss this scenario out of hand? They wouldn''t even bother replying to that bid I wouldnt imagine.

  21. Posted

    [quote user="pete"]

    HK because of age does not need to be in squad of 25, if season long loan City will play for entire season, why send him back other than being useless?

    [/quote]
    Because he fills up a loan slot and we''re working on bringing two in? (God I hope not).
    Because we''re not going to use him so will free up some wages for us and Spurs can send him somewhere else?
    Injured?

  22. Posted

    [quote user="RenegadeSnare"]How can you not like David Beckham?[/quote]
    The brand far exceeds the talent he actually had. He was a decent player, but I never understood the hype around him.
    I''ve never liked him ever since the infamous wedding and the thrones and all that self-imposed grandeur nonsense. 

  24. Posted

    [quote user="VMan Canary"]I have also heard this from a reliable source but was waiting for someone else to bring it up. But have been informed Harry Kane''s loan deal may be ending and he will be going back to Spurs by the end of the window.

    I don''t really have an opinion on Kane because he''s been injured for the most part so you judge whether this a good or bad thing.

    So if this transpires

    It could mean one of several things

    A- We are going to be left short of options in the forward department again

    B- The board are confident on they can get one of their potential targets.

    C- The board are trying to free space in the squad for another position or just for Kei Kamara and don''t have any intention of adding to the squad upfront.

    No I don''t wish to disclose the source

    No I am not 100% certain of this as I am not sure of details of his loan agreement but I am sure you or your fellow posters will know the exact details of the terms more than I do.

    No I am not a wind up merchant but I just don''t post that often but just wanted to offer the interesting news also.[/quote]
    C) Is definitely not correct cuz loans only count from British clubs. His loan will be classified as a "temporary transfer" as it is international, therefore he doesn''t affect our 2 loan slots.
×
×
  • Create New...