Jump to content

Yellow Kiwi

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    31

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Yellow Kiwi

  2. Posted

    9 hours ago, The Real Buh said:

    going to a game of football is so passé these days when you can do what a proper football fan does and watch from Indonesia and pretend you are a fan or, indeed, have any idea what’s going on.

    Good to know I’m not a proper fan because I now live on the opposite side of the planet.

  4. Posted

    5 hours ago, wheres my rebate gone? said:

    I’m sorry it took you so long, I personally thought it was very obvious!

    I prostrate myself before your footballing genius. When did you have it figured out something special was on its way? Lots of people on here took a whole lot longer than me. I could start bumping threads if you don’t believe me. 

  5. Posted

    1 hour ago, wheres my rebate gone? said:

    Only a fool couldn’t see what he was trying to achieve and it certainly didn’t take 15 months to play good football winning or not!

    I suggest you go back and look at the forum from August 2018 because you don’t have to look hard to find plenty of posts calling for Farke to be sacked. Even more posters saying the quality of most of the football was awful to watch at that time so I’m not sure what you are calling good football. Do you not recall all the reports of Farke being dumped if we lost to Ipswich? 
     

    FYI Millwall game in January 2018 was when I first figured what Farke was trying to achieve. It didn’t make most of it less painful to watch for the rest of the season though because it appeared so rarely. Don’t get me wrong, Daniel got us playing the best football I’ve ever seen at the club but some do seem to have heavily rose tinted specs on or poor memories of the early days. 

  8. Posted

    19 minutes ago, Branston Pickle said:

    That’s precisely my point?  If you don’t know what you’re buying, don’t buy it - it’s not particularly cheap.

    True enough. Sky can have my money next time rather than the club. Looked into it in a bit more detail and it would seem for an extra $5 (£2:50) / month I could have Sky Sport with all its channels and I’m pretty sure I could have watched at least 5 games by the end of August. If Canary Radio is value as some have tried suggesting then Sky is an absolute steal. 

  9. Posted

    34 minutes ago, Greavsy said:

    Isn't that similar to purchasing a ST. 

    No, not really. You can still go. You haven’t been told entry isn’t available to ST holders. 

     

    1 hour ago, Branston Pickle said:

    I have to say that calling it a ‘disgraceful rip off’ is rather over the top - the broadcast deals are certainly confusing, but I think we all know this. Before committing the cash on it perhaps people should check what it is that they are purchasing - over a season it will presumably work out pretty decent vfm.  

    So what was I purchasing. Even now you couldn’t tell me just what it is I purchased. I have no idea whether I will get to watch 5 games or 25. I have no idea if I will be able to watch a particular game until my alarm has woken me in the middle of the night and I find out the game is or isn’t available. I don’t think I’m being unreasonable in having expected to be able to watch more than 1 game in 8 by the end of the month. I’m pretty sure iFollow used to let me watch games 'as live' about 48 hrs after the restricted feed so I could pretend I was watching live as long as I didn’t go looking for the result. No such option seems to exist on Canary Radio. 

  10. Posted

    6 hours ago, kick it off said:

    15 games would be decent value.

    It’s not just about value though. It’s about actually being able to watch games. Having had an iFollow account every year it was an option I wasn’t expecting every game but I wasn’t expecting Canary TV to actually be Canary Radio. Thought I was doing the right thing giving my money to the club, but should have paid double to Sky and got 7 times the games plus everything else Sky offers. 

  13. Posted

    Here we go. Yet another game I can’t watch on Canarytv having coughed up £140. Currently running at 1 game from 6. Bournemouth won’t be available and I suspect neither will Sunderland making it 1 from 8. Feel like I have been completely robbed and won’t be giving the club any more of my hard earned cash until I’m confident something has changed. 

    • Like 2

  14. Posted

    9 hours ago, Jools said:

    Sleepy is likely to win the popular vote because of illegal votes by non-citizens/mail-in voter fraud in California & NY -- Same as Hillary 2016, but Trumpski will win the election 😎 

    I’m confused by American politics and would appreciate some enlightenment from someone of your obvious intellect and knowledge. 

    I thought illegal votes and mail in fraud were well known back in 2016 which is why DT lost the popular vote. Unfortunately I don’t quite get why, after 4 years in charge he has chosen to do nothing about sorting it out. 

    Why is it that Republican states can do mail in voting properly but Democrat states are just rife with corruption. How many illegal voters are there in CA &NY? 

    Can you predict numbers for voter fraud in other states or are we just calling all votes for Democratic candidates fraudulent and fake news. 

    If you are wrong and DT loses I look forward to seeing you, RTB et al on here admitting you were mistaken but I suspect we won’t see you for dust. 

    • Like 1

  16. Posted

    I’m not quite sure where I’m going to end up with this post so apologies if it turns into a bit of a rant but these protesters and their ilk just make me so angry. 

    Six years ago I made the decision to leave the UK and move out here to New Zealand. What a great decision that has turned out to be. Apart from the great lifestyle, how nice it is to have a government that at least seems 90% competent when it comes to Covid and its response. A defined plan, a clear message passed on to the populace by daily press briefings and a population on board with very, very few exceptions. As such, over six months down the line and we still have fewer than 2000 cases and only 25 deaths. Life goes on pretty much as normal given the world we currently live in, just without the tourists which is the biggest hit to the economy. 

    Every country seems to have their conspiracy theory loons but seeing protesters complaining of tyranny and loss of civil liberties and infringement of their human rights just winds me up. There are many countries in the world with tyrannical rulers but the UK is such a long way from that. Go visit those countries, try protesting the government and you might find out what tyranny really looks like. Anyone care to explain to me which part of the Bill of Human Rights these protestors have had violated. Certainly not the part about being allowed to protest peacefully without fear of arrest. As for civil liberties, I’m not entirely sure what is meant by that but the way these people talk about them is what really angers me. How is wearing a mask or having to social distance to stop the spread of a highly infectious, potentially debilitating or lethal disease such a problem. If everyone sucked it up and did what was required for 6-8 weeks you could bring it under control and then go back to a normal life. Instead, that seems to much to ask of many people and my parents ( in their 80s and living in Scotland) have now been in total lockdown for more than seven months. And I mean total lockdown. They just don’t leave the house. What about their civil liberties to be able to go outside and live their lives without fear of being infected with something that has a high chance of killing at least one of them. With the increase in cases and winter coming, to potentially make things worse I have no idea when they will be able to get out and about. I can’t see it being 2020 so probably another 5 months at least. They’ve been ok so far because it’s been summer and they’ve been able to spend time in the garden but I worry for their psychological well-being over the winter. Words can’t describe the loathing I feel for these people and their selfishness. 

    Apologies to anyone who has read this far but I just needed somewhere to sound off and voice my worries and anger at the way things seem to be in the UK. 

    • Like 4
    • Thanks 1

  18. Posted

    7 hours ago, Bill said:

     'hambition' and an 'hinvestor' that’s e whats we need

    get a ground as big as the Stadium of Light, spend the kind of money like as what Villa. ......we can cope with debt...look at our successful neighbours

    get someone like Brighton have got and we could be just as successful like thems at

    ....Stoke, Swansea, Boro, Huddersfield. Cardiff, Reading, Hull, Blackburn - even Blackpool or Bolton are

    instead we waste other people's money on new changing rooms at Colney, and stupid flag things to cover up the empty seats

    we can't even afford ball boys or stewards ..... and what happened to playing Man Utd in the cup. eh ?

    the club have gone quiet about that 'h'aint they ?

    and those two old codgers Delia and (no) Wyn didn't even bother to turn up

    the club is a shambles

     

    Quite a bit gets directed at Bill as well but this is a great dig at all the usual suspects who only exist to moan about the club they claim to support. 

  19. Posted

    True. But then it’s difficult not to describe people carrying firebrands, waving swastikas and shouting 'Jews will not replace us' without using the 'N' word. I suggest you would need to be a bit that way inclined to call them 'good people'. 

     

    • Like 4

  22. Posted

    5 hours ago, Herman said:

    Grifters gonna grift.

     

    Firstly, 6k doctors don’t say it works. 37% of 6.2k  is 6k. 'Works' implies cure which is not the same as 'most effective therapy'. If I have a cold, a tissue is a more effective therapy than a bag of sawdust. Doesn’t mean I’m cured. 

    Kudos to the Daily Mail as well for claiming 37% is a majority. It might be the largest group but a majority it is not. 

  23. Posted

    So West Ham must have been relegated last season having lost 4-0 in last seasons first match at Anfield. Oh wait.... it appears they didn’t. How can that be?

    Did anyone else concede four against Liverpool or lose by a 3 goal margin? Let’s take a look. 

    Southampton lost by 3. They must be in the championship this season. What do you mean 'no'?

    Cardiff conceded four so 'talk sh!te' presumably called.that one right. 

    Watford lost by 3 and Bournemouth and Newcastle both conceded 4, so that’s the other two relegation places filled alongside Cardiff, right? It’s not right? Well surely one of them must have gone down? How can it be that they all survived.

    Arsenal conceded 5, Palace 4, Bournemouth and Watford both lost again by 3 and 5 respectively. They must have all had a real battle to not be relegated after results like that. How did they possibly finish 36, 15, 11 and 16  points clear of relegation. 5th, 11th, 12th and 14th. 

    Well Burnley conceded 4. They must have gone down cos they don’t have any money either. They just started their fourth consecutive season in the Premiership you say?

    And I presume the pundits got it right when Huddersfield lost by 5 with only two more games to play. Not too difficult a call since they were already relegated by that time  

    So 10 teams lost by the same or greater margin to Liverpool, two of them twice and 8 of them are still in the top flight. So to everyone, especially those who still haven’t learnt from the first five games last season, let’s just get a few more games under our belt before drawing any definitive conclusions from Fridays game. 

     

    • Like 5

  24. Posted

    I think Ward might have the right answer by giving teams a number of appeals rather than every decision being looked over. I’m enjoying watching the cricket World Cup at the moment and each side is given one appeal. Imagine the difference if every potentially dubious call was looked at. 😴 In tennis the players have to use a given number of appeals each set. In the NFL coaches get two appeals per game plus one extra if they are both successful. There may well be other examples but none of these review every decision that could affect the result.

    I’ve  not had the chance to see VAR in action in its current form but as well as frequency of reviews, reduced by the above, the time taken seems to be a problem as well. Isn’t it supposed to be for obvious errors, therefore a decision should be able to be reached in a fairly short designated time, otherwise it’s not obvious and the decision stands  

    The only time I’ve seen VAR in action was the cup game against Chelsea, however many years ago, and it seemed to work quite well for us proving their players to be a bunch of divers. 

    I suspect VAR is here to stay but, from comments, it needs a fairly major rethink on just how it’s going to be used. 

     

  25. Posted

    The discussion here is now about whether we need three or four strikers for next season in the PL. From other posts, my understanding is Rhodes is a sixth choice striker for them as an average Championship club. Sixth choice! And they still claim he’s worth £7m. How much must the other five be worth? The rest of the squad must be absolute garbage to finish where they did in the league with five strikers worth over 7mil banging in goals for fun. 😂 

    Plainly a completely outrageous evaluation with Wednesday trying it on because we got promoted. Webber has stated no price was agreed which is good enough for me. I’ll take Webbers word over Wednesdays on this one any day of the week. 😉 

×
×
  • Create New...