Peter 0 Posted January 9, 2004 Did I read correctly the cost of 1,800 seat infil between South and N&P would cost £2.5m.I believe I also read that not building would save £650,000 and at the time we couldn''t afford the cost.Well what is the right position ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0Amarillo<P><FONT color=#cccc00 size=4><EM> º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ Amarillo ¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°<EM><FONT><P>ddMMyyyy0Falseen-US<P><FONT color=#cccc00 size=4><EM> º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ Amarillo ¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°<EM><FONT><P>True 0 Posted January 9, 2004 I guess, if you''re building it at the same time as the main stand it will cost a lot less than coming back and doing it later. So it makes sense that the later cost is more than the saving. Which makes it even more of a shame they couldn''t do it now. But then, when the decision was made the prospect of being where we are now wasn''t really there was it?Who''d want to be in the decision makers'' shoes? Sod''s law says whatever you decide, events will conspire against you. ;-)Ama Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
