Jump to content

Kangaroo Court

Members
  • Content Count

    512
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by Kangaroo Court


  1. [quote user="Angry man"]Suggest if you can you have a quick look at RVW tweets after signing for St Etienne .

    Whatever you might think of him his comments are I think heart felt!!.

    Pity Snodgrass couldn''t leave with as much class !!!!.[/quote]
    Snoddy left a very long and heartfelt message to Norwich fans on twitter too. Why have a dig at him?

  2. [quote user="bloodwagon"][quote user="Kangaroo Court"][quote user="bloodwagon"][quote user="Kangaroo Court"]And why exactly was it necessary to start a new thread containing absolutely no new information?[/quote] And why shouldnt he/she/them, You dont like the thread DONT READ IT, simple really. By the way, since when was you a mod ???[/quote]
    How can I judge if I like it if I haven''t read it?
    [/quote]After you read the title you still didnt know it was about RVW ? You STILL read it, you decided you didnt like it and complained. Instead of just going to the next thread ?Sounds about right :([/quote]
    You''re not very bright are you? I knew it was about RvW but was hoping that it contained some new information or insight. It didn''t so I commented on that. You decided to complain about that.

  3. [quote user="bloodwagon"][quote user="Kangaroo Court"]And why exactly was it necessary to start a new thread containing absolutely no new information?[/quote] And why shouldnt he/she/them, You dont like the thread DONT READ IT, simple really. By the way, since when was you a mod ???[/quote]
    How can I judge if I like it if I haven''t read it?

  4. [quote user="City1st"][quote user="Kangaroo Court"][quote user="Highland Canary"]It''s certainly a win from our perspective. RvW and Bassong were our most ineffective players last season. It represents a signal from the club that we are moving on from the disaster that was last season.[/quote]

    I agree that from a footballing perspective it''s a win for us as RvW came to symbolise all that was wrong last season, but from a financial perspective it seems St Etienne are getting a win-win deal. I suppose the club are just desperate to get rid of him as this is the best (or only) deal on offer.[/quote]as said by master mortimer..........as none of us know what the deal is then how can we make comment on that deal ?as to him going off on a seasons loan, that arrangement doesn''t seem to have hurt Rudd or Surmanso why not concentrate on the future instead of looking for something to attack the club with ?

    [/quote]
    I''m not "attacking" the club at all. What is this obsession that some people have about that? It''s normal for fans to debate the merits of a transfer.
    You mention Rudd and Surman but neither of those flopped in the previous season, they just weren''t in the manager''s plans. I think a loan would be good but the buy-out clause is bad. The worst case scenario would be that he flops again in France and comes back worth almost nothing.

  5. [quote user="Highland Canary"]It''s certainly a win from our perspective. RvW and Bassong were our most ineffective players last season. It represents a signal from the club that we are moving on from the disaster that was last season.[/quote]

    I agree that from a footballing perspective it''s a win for us as RvW came to symbolise all that was wrong last season, but from a financial perspective it seems St Etienne are getting a win-win deal. I suppose the club are just desperate to get rid of him as this is the best (or only) deal on offer.

  6. I''m talking about the option to buy at the end of the loan.

    Scenario 1: RvW has a brilliant season, scores 20+ goals and his value goes back up to £8.5 million. We lose as St Etienne take up the option to buy and get him on the cheap.

    Scenario 2: RvW has an awful season, scores one goal or gets injured. St Etienne don''t take up the option and he comes back to us worth a couple of million at best.

    We shouldn''t give them this option to buy. Either just a loan or they buy him outright. We can only lose from the current deal (as reported).

  7. [quote user="morty"][quote user="Kangaroo Court"][quote user="morty"][quote user="Kangaroo Court"][quote user="morty"][quote user="Bor Bor Bor"]Wasn''t aware of the Gutierrez/Adams tweet fiasco but this appears to show Adams was rightly pissed off about it:[/quote]Gutierrez later claimed that he was talking about a situation with an Argentinian club.Depends if you believe, and how you want to interpret what players tweet I guess[:)][/quote]
    You''re the only one who has seen this claim by Gutierrez. Are you sure you didn''t imagine it? It''s strange you can''t provide a link. In any case it''s very obvious to everyone that he was talking about Adams. Or are you so gullible you think it''s a coincidence that he tweeted right after the Chelsea game and also made a reference to Mourinho? Get a grip man, you''re living in your own fantasy land.
    [/quote]I couldn''t give a flying fig what you think.[/quote]
    Yet you keep replying but keep failing to provide the link. You obviously made it up, showing what credibility you have.
    [/quote]There is no link, it was tweets.And you are just another bell-end logging in to have a pop at me, rather than actually discuss football.[/quote]
    So provide a link to the relevant tweet. You can''t because either you made it up or you have "limited" reading skills. If you want to discuss football you have to get your facts right and if you''re shown to have said something completely untrue, don''t spit your dummy out if someone calls you out on it.

  8. [quote user="morty"][quote user="Kangaroo Court"][quote user="morty"][quote user="Bor Bor Bor"]Wasn''t aware of the Gutierrez/Adams tweet fiasco but this appears to show Adams was rightly pissed off about it:[/quote]Gutierrez later claimed that he was talking about a situation with an Argentinian club.Depends if you believe, and how you want to interpret what players tweet I guess[:)][/quote]
    You''re the only one who has seen this claim by Gutierrez. Are you sure you didn''t imagine it? It''s strange you can''t provide a link. In any case it''s very obvious to everyone that he was talking about Adams. Or are you so gullible you think it''s a coincidence that he tweeted right after the Chelsea game and also made a reference to Mourinho? Get a grip man, you''re living in your own fantasy land.
    [/quote]I couldn''t give a flying fig what you think.[/quote]
    Yet you keep replying but keep failing to provide the link. You obviously made it up, showing what credibility you have.

  9. [quote user="morty"][quote user="Bor Bor Bor"]Wasn''t aware of the Gutierrez/Adams tweet fiasco but this appears to show Adams was rightly pissed off about it:[/quote]Gutierrez later claimed that he was talking about a situation with an Argentinian club.Depends if you believe, and how you want to interpret what players tweet I guess[:)][/quote]
    You''re the only one who has seen this claim by Gutierrez. Are you sure you didn''t imagine it? It''s strange you can''t provide a link. In any case it''s very obvious to everyone that he was talking about Adams. Or are you so gullible you think it''s a coincidence that he tweeted right after the Chelsea game and also made a reference to Mourinho? Get a grip man, you''re living in your own fantasy land.

  10. [quote user="morty"][quote user="Kangaroo Court"][quote user="morty"][quote user="Kangaroo Court"]morty has a bizarre habit of misreading tweets. He claimed a Gutierrez tweet criticising Adams was about an Argentinian team (which it very obviously wasn''t) and now he claims an RVW tweet saying "guess it''s just a number" shows RVW is displeased (which it very obviously doesn''t).[/quote]You''re wrong, it was nothing to do with Adams. People just assumed it was, and the whole thing was cleared up not long after. And the people that tweeted hate to him made themselves look pretty stupid.[/quote]
    Please post a link showing that "the whole thing was cleared up". Otherwise the only one who has made himself look stupid is you. 
    [/quote]I really couldn''t care less mate, go google it yourself.[/quote]
    It doesn''t exist, except in your delusional mind. Nice cop out though.

  11. [quote user="morty"][quote user="Kangaroo Court"]morty has a bizarre habit of misreading tweets. He claimed a Gutierrez tweet criticising Adams was about an Argentinian team (which it very obviously wasn''t) and now he claims an RVW tweet saying "guess it''s just a number" shows RVW is displeased (which it very obviously doesn''t).[/quote]You''re wrong, it was nothing to do with Adams. People just assumed it was, and the whole thing was cleared up not long after. And the people that tweeted hate to him made themselves look pretty stupid.[/quote]
    Please post a link showing that "the whole thing was cleared up". Otherwise the only one who has made himself look stupid is you. 
×
×
  • Create New...