Jump to content

Norfolkn Good

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    114

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Norfolkn Good

  4. Posted

    3 minutes ago, BobLoz3 said:

    Should just be 10, same as it is online. Would likely alleviate a number of issues.

    By the way, it doesn't affect me so much as I didn't buy a membership. Also, I have only HEARD that it is 10 online. So I'm basing that on... hearsay! Haha.

    I thought it was a limit of 50 online or in person but haven't checked that

  5. Posted

    1 hour ago, BobLoz3 said:

    So, the limit online is capped to 10.

    The limit if you go and queue up is 50??! Absolutely bonkers imo.

    With this, does the coach company have to obtain 40 membership numbers of those wanting to go? I would have thought so, otherwise they wouldn't be able to go.

    I feel this is just as bad as being a tout. Charging people (for the pleasure of not getting up) and then making bank from others misfortune.

    LAME.

    All 40 are members but only one person has to make any effort.  

    There will be plenty of groups with 8+ people trying to get the tickets giving them 8x the chance of a single user.  I'm guessing setting the limit at 4 would be fairer - but then they'll be a number of people moaning on here that they're being disadvantaged as there's 5 of them in a family. Cant please everyone

  6. Posted

    16 minutes ago, Van wink said:

    ""They were fourth from the front before being told they were sold out. Before them, they had seen several people before them buying multiple tickets (30-40) which is really unfair," he said."

     

    Any idea how this can be fair?

    It’s a coach company. They put 1 person in the queue at 4am, buy 40 tickets, charge those 40 a fee for the lack of sleep..

    not against the rules but of course not really fair

  7. Posted

    40 minutes ago, lake district canary said:

    If you look back, I was not the first to talk about the riding behaviour of cyclists.

    you are a miserable, useless, bell end of a 'man' though. There's little point having a reasoned debate with you - it's not worth the effort

  23. Posted

    So Jez probably shouted at little Tommy and his sobbing woke up his auntie and uncle long enough to stop their geriatric dribbling. They then got that nice man they saw on Strictly to have a word and it went pear shaped from there.

    I think Jez is the lucky one in getting away from a Board only Spitting Image could do justice to.

    We''re Fu(ked I''m afraid....
×
×
  • Create New...