Jump to content

Mike

Members
  • Content Count

    1,439
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Mike


  1. Perfectly reasonable to question the new structure and indeed the people & their relationships, that sit within the new structure.

    I think it is fair to question why we are having issues getting a settled structure, with the departure of Moxey & now Stone.

    I think it is fair to question whether Webber now has too much power and whether it is sensible to have a husband & wife team in the new structure and all the potential issues that can arise from that relationship (as most successful companies do not allow it).

    It''s also fair to voice disappointment at Steve Stone''s exit given most people thought he was doing a great job under difficult circumstances.

    Been no abuse or "snidey comments" apart from the usual suspects that like to shut down debate & opposing views.

    This is not an attack on anyone, it''s a voicing of concerns which shows our passion for our club.

    Crack on people...

  2. [quote user="hogesar"]No idea how people can possibly be so naive in criticising a wife and husband being on the same ''board''.

    Seen it in several local companies that are doing well and as Purple states, some much larger profile companies too.[/quote]

    So main reason why its best practice in the majority of businesses these day..

    1. Partners fall out and take their petty differences into work.

    2. They get divorced who leaves

    3. They get on and vote down the only bloke disagreeing even if he is right..normal to have your partners back

    Soo many other reasons.

    No one with the best interests of NCFC would not question the new structure.


  3. [quote user="PurpleCanary"]
    [quote user="Mike "]The business I work in, does not encourage husband & wives working together due to the issues it can bring. Not the most professional of structures.. I can not imagine Webber or his wife ever disagreeing thus they have a very powerful say on our direction.[/quote]
    I''m guessing you''ve never been married...[:P]
    [/quote]

    Twice... there was no argument, I did as I was told or suffered the consequences

  4. The business I work in, does not encourage husband & wives working together due to the issues it can bring. Not the most professional of structures.. I can not imagine Webber or his wife ever disagreeing thus they have a very powerful say on our direction.

  5. [quote user="Jim Smith"]Not mad keen on this new management structure to be honest. A cynic night think that Stone has been gradually sidelined (who was it that took over responsibility for transfers last summer) and has decided to move on. I don’t like the fact there seems to be very little in the way of checks and balances on Webber (or should that be the Webbers). I had thought after McNally was allowed to become a bit of a control freak that we might have learnt our lesson.[/quote]

    Totally agree Jim... Sad to see Steve Stone go but obviously did not feel part of the team or was not content in his role.

  6. We do not know but again until the club, issue a statement then rumours will abound.

    Worried that we do not seem to get the CEO position right at the moment and would expect no structural changes, given the lauding of the new setup at the beginning of the last season.

    Really hope it is not Webber or nephew Tom but someone with the experience in being a CEO of a football club.

  7. [quote user="Jim Smith"]I guess the key question in terms of how worrying it is is why? He could just have been offered a better paid job and decided to jump ship. The alternative is that there is some other reason he has decided to leave such as disagreements behind hmthe scenes or a realisisation he was fighting a losing battle under the self funding model.

    He’d better not get a payoff if he’s quit though and Balls better not pocket another hefty sum for “standing in”[/quote]

    All very very strange... No doubt, in this new spirit of openness and togethernes, the club will tell us all soon.

  8. [quote user="McCanary"]There were a fair few conversations going on about it in the gunn club after the game

    I am surprised Archant haven''t been on it[/quote]

    Thank you... A sensible reply to something LOTS of people where talking about.

    Like I said there seems to be a lot of talk about this... Personally I hope it is not true.

  9. [quote user="Faded Jaded Semi Plastic SOB"]We had more shots on target than Stoke so they must also be "powder puff" up front. In the end the game was won by an unfortunate own goal, that is just football for you. The fact that the team were roundly applauded after the game speaks volumes............[/quote]

    We have been getting the rub of the green on our unbeaten run and as its always a 1 goal difference for us we were bound to lose one sooner rather than later.. didn''t believe the hype after winning four on the trot not too arsed about losing this one.
×
×
  • Create New...