Jump to content

Mike

Members
  • Content Count

    1,434
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Everything posted by Mike

  1. [quote user="Alex Moss"][quote user="Rudolph Hucker"]It also showed what we are missing to have a proper go at promotion and that is goals taken.[/quote] You are talking nonsense. We are not battering teams 4-0 week in week in out, but we are winning nearly all of our games these days - and that’s what gets you promotion.[/quote] Agreed..lost to the fair play creating club... hate how people laud these cheats. We were unlucky
  2. Is he playing well because his contract is up? Definitely seems more motivated. I have heard he likes the area and the club so I guess it whether he is willing to accept the new wage structure. I hope he stays.
  3. [quote user="king canary"]"It also suggests the paupers are in a bad a state as I have previously stated. They are accepting a youth coach as their first team coach." We accepted a youth coach as our manager, does this mean we''re in a bad state? You don''t half post some nonsense.[/quote] Hucks posted that it was our loss and their gain. Said he was a great coach. I trust Hucks view..
  4. [quote user="nutty nigel"]Mike, What makes you think you have any rights to say what I post? I find some posters more than exceedingly tiresome, of which you''re one, but your perfectly within your rights to be more than exceedingly tiresome to me.[/quote] Oh well I tried...
  5. [quote user="nutty nigel"]Glad bullying behaviour and being impolite has been downgraded to exceeding tiresome. I''ll just carry on with that until they rewrite the code of conduct[/quote] Look, I have no desire to offend you or upset at all. I apologise you got offended by by posts. All I am asking is you give a bit more consideration to others you may not appreciate your type of Posting / banter. OTBC
  6. [quote user="nutty nigel"]Sorry Mike but I don''t see where I haven''t kept it polite. And TBH I''m pretty sick of you suggesting otherwise. We are what we post not what other posters say we post.[/quote] Again sorry if you feel that but I do find some of your replies to me, when "not on message" exceeding tiresome. You can not stop me having an opinion. I do not have a problem with King Canary, Jim, And Smith, Tilly... Shall be stop this and move on?
  7. [quote user="nutty nigel"]Sorry Mike but I don''t see where I haven''t kept it polite. And TBH I''m pretty sick of you suggesting otherwise. We are what we post not what other posters say we post.[/quote] Again sorry if you feel that but I do find some of your replies to me, when "not on message" exceeding tiresome. You can not stop me having an opinion. I do not have a problem with King Canary, Jim, And Smith, Tilly... Shall be stop this and move on?
  8. I will say this once more and once more only... I missed the original email from xymox (as I said the constant digs and moans at anyone outside of the 100% pro Delia camp bore me) but a bet is a bet and if I lose it (lets hope I do because it will mean we have had a much better season that I had predicted) I will gladly pay up to xymox or any chosen charity. 100% guaranteed. I am sorry that this bet offended you, if only you had the same respect when others bemoan what they see to be boorish behaviour. As I have said on countless occasions, keep it polite and I will polite back. Anyway, all good as if I have to pay out Norwich have had a great season and if not I was right & a charity will be £250 better off. OTBC
  9. [quote user="Faded Jaded Semi Plastic SOB"]My heart goes out to the family and friends of those involved in this terrible accident.......[/quote] Was hoping the delay in confirming names meant that some.of them had survived... really sad
  10. [quote user="Mike "][quote user="hogesar"]Baring in mind Mike consistently makes snide remarks about behaviour on this forum, my own ''front'' and whatever else he has said; I find this thread to be brilliant. [:)].But yes xymox, was a great charity bet idea, fair play to you.[/quote] Hogesar, you find it brilliant , I find it equally hilarious that you and Nutty Nigel go on about snide remarks... Clasdic bullying behaviour. Will gladly pay up if I lose the bet, to charity or anything else. Not giving the money to people I do not trust or respect. I will sort it out with...And Smith Must Score who is a decent fellow not taken to having petty dogs at fellow City fans. You have a lovely week now x[/quote] Lol! Petty dogs not dogs...and classic bullying...moving trains eh...
  11. [quote user="hogesar"]Baring in mind Mike consistently makes snide remarks about behaviour on this forum, my own ''front'' and whatever else he has said; I find this thread to be brilliant. [:)].But yes xymox, was a great charity bet idea, fair play to you.[/quote] Hogesar, you find it brilliant , I find it equally hilarious that you and Nutty Nigel go on about snide remarks... Clasdic bullying behaviour. Will gladly pay up if I lose the bet, to charity or anything else. Not giving the money to people I do not trust or respect. I will sort it out with...And Smith Must Score who is a decent fellow not taken to having petty dogs at fellow City fans. You have a lovely week now x
  12. [quote user="nutty nigel"][quote user="Herman"]Whose opinion''s would your ''friend'' not want to read?[/quote]xymox by the looks of things..[/quote] Friend of mine knows you Nutty, says you are a nice fella... Ps. I am not sending £250 to someone I do not know. Sorry but ain''t gonna happen x
  13. [quote user="nutty nigel"]I''m not having a dig Mike. The poster called xymox accepted your bet. I wouldn''t because I couldn''t afford to lose it and anyway I could have got much better odds at a bookmakers. So is the bet on?I didn''t choose 21 games. TBH I think it was daft to lump 16 games from last season with 5 games from this and then make up a stat that tells only half the story.So the second half of last season was 6 defeats in 23 games which tells the other half.But if 21 games across two seasons floats your boat then it''s now 9 wins in 21 games.Or how about the last 8 games which is 6 wins?Or just this season which is 7 wins in 14 games.However if you just take the games we lost since Farke took over it 0 wins in 20 games. But then it would also be 22 wins from 22 games if you just considered the games we won.Apart from the last 14 games stat none of the others make much sense do they? Including the 4 wins from 21 games...Back to that £250....[/quote] Will gladly pay up if in the team is in the top 6... will the other fella... over to you... this is fun! Mike "filthy rich"
  14. [quote user="nutty nigel"]I agree Kingo. They aren''t linked like that and were never meant to be. I understood the idea was that we could change the head coach with a minimum disruption to the rest of the staff . That only works if the rest of the staff are Webber appointments. As for the 21 games. I don''t see the significance of 21 unless it was the 21st game of the season. But the last 21 games was the number they were being judged on. Is there any significance in 21 games?[/quote] You could judge him after last season and then the poor start this season but thankfully he seems to be having a positive influence across the whole team now.. no idea why you would choose 21 or the often spoken of, 10 games.
  15. [quote user="nutty nigel"]Mike I don''t keep a record of your posts but some are unforgettable. Like all that Billy big bolloxing about £250. Just because you have more money to throw around doesn''t make your opinion worth more than anyone else''s. It''s just boorish behaviour but fits well with the idea that more money is better and richer people are better. You think I should have taken your bet? I haven''t got £250 to risk and, as I said at the time, if I had the bookies would have given me much better odds than evs. However a poster called xymox took it. Or tried to. I wasn''t surprised it appeared to fall on deaf ears....[/quote] Still havin a dig, still not willing to up the standard of debate, still having pops but not able to accept the same back... Go on try be polite, it''s good... we might even end up friends :o) PS. The rich thing is most amusing... reckon alot of my mates will be having a chortle at that..
  16. [quote user="hogesar"]Lambert was great for us but cant say Im even slightly concerned about him managing them. Hes been bang average since us and has a load of League One and Two players to deal with. Thats including signings this summer that came for Hurst, or played under Hurst previously, or both. Pre season Hursts stock was much higher than Lamberts. If he goes, then bad luck to him.[/quote] More concerned if Culverhouse becomes his number 2! But let''s hope he cements his City status by getting them relegated.
×
×
  • Create New...