Jump to content

Chichcan

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    243

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Chichcan

  2. Posted

    6 minutes ago, lake district canary said:

    Really not sure about whether to put Pukki back in to this one. If he is 100% fit and ready, yes, but if not, no harm with sticking with Idah and Pukki can get a few minutes from the bench.  Idah needs the minutes more than Pukki at the moment.  

                        Gunn

    Aarons Hanley Gibson Giannoulis

                   Sara    Mclean

       Hernandez    Nunez     Tzolis

                         Idah

     

    That's my team too

    Pukki to come on for a run around near the end 

  4. Posted

    3 minutes ago, Captain Holt said:

    He isn't, he's on a yearly rolling contract from today. Essentially a 12 month notice period for either party.

    Is that what it means?

    I wasn't sure,  but looking at the Athletic article here

    https://theathletic.com/4184890/2021/11/25/norwich-sporting-director-stuart-webber-agrees-new-contract-at-club/

    It says "Webber and Norwich's board will now review his situation each summer before committing to the following year."

    I took that to mean they could decide to not renew it this summer and he'd be off

  8. Posted

    I don't think we should fire him, but he is on a yearly rolling contract until June and I think we should be looking at someone new then

    I think he's done well, but 6 years is a long time and we need a fresh face with new ideas to build on what he's done

  18. Posted

    13 hours ago, Newtopia said:

    For me;

    Gunn

    Mumba Omobalidele Tomkinson McCallum

    Gibbs Nunez

    Tzolis McLean Sara (Rowe)

    Sargent (Idah)

    Then sprinkle in a bit of seasoned experience……

    I'm not sure how much Mumba plays as a RB any more

    I saw in Plymouth's last game they were playing a 4231 and he was the left man of the 3

    He seems to be a left wing back or winger this season 

  20. Posted

    5 minutes ago, Ken Hairy said:

    He admitted he still believed in Smith, well have the courage of your convictions and be proven right or die trying. Like I said, it's an admission of weakness.

    I'm not really sure what you're arguing. Are you saying he should have kept Smith on?

    I'm glad he's admitted it didn't work and the club needs a reset and a change of direction.  It seems sensible to me 

  21. Posted

    I thought it was a reasonably good interview 

    He accepted he had underestimated the fans' desire to connect with the manager and to play a certain way and accepted the club need to change that with the next appointment 

    Also saying 2 of the shortlist aren't even in the betting markets is good from my point of view. Shows they're looking far and wide

    • Like 9

  23. Posted

    10 minutes ago, norfolkngood said:

    so you wouldn't ask him ?

    better to ask and get turned down than not even ask the question ?

    first rule of Nightclubs when i was 17 !!! 

     

    How do you know we haven't asked him?

    I suspect we made a serious attempt to get him after Farke but he eventually said no. I'm sure we'd have been back in touch to see if he's changed his mind

    Still, even if Bailey is right we don't know the other 3 on the list so he could be one of them

×
×
  • Create New...