Jump to content

STFU

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    652

  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by STFU

  5. Posted

    Thumbs up if you think ruthie should just feck off.

    👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 Etc

  9. Posted

    [quote user="Cambridge Yellow"]Whilst, I dont think Bennett is a better option than Martin or Bassong, neither can complain if they are dropped on current form. If only to send the message that they are not automatic selections and can''t be complacent. It seemed to do the trick when Hart temporarily lost his place to Pantilimmon for Man City.

    The only problem I''d have with switching Russell Martin to right back is what his performance level would be like there. He''s only played there very occasionally in thr last 18 months and wasn''t particularly distinguished there when he did play. It''s a big ask to flick that switch and play there after so long away.[/quote]

    But he''s an international class defender Cambridge, he should have no trouble switching back to right back 😳

  12. Posted

    Well done Bor, I was just about to point that out to Gainer.

    He continues to be persistently stupid, like missing the point about children committing mass murder. Nobody said they did, what they said was that there have been cases of young children accidentally killing other children with guns owned by their parents.

  16. Posted

    There''s some really quite desperate ''logic'' (for want of a better word) in use there ruthers. Sunderland were poor all game, they got a consolation goal in the last few minutes, they had given up long before the third goal went in. The FACT is that as they only scored 1 goal, 2 would have been enough to beat them. Therefore your ''point'' is totally disproved.
×
×
  • Create New...