Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Yellowhammer

Mackay with Adams assisting

Recommended Posts

Looks like the F A aren''t going to pursue any charges because the texts between Malkay and Moody were private so guess that leaves him free to take a  job now but didn''t he turn us down before because he wanted his own backroom staff or was that just a rumour and would anyone want him here now anyway??
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/news/11172185/Former-Cardiff-City-manager-Malky-Mackay-poised-to-escape-action-by-the-Football-Association-over-texts.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="Cheap Cheap Canaries"]No manager is going to step down to be somebodys assistant , just wont happen .[/quote] It''s a step up from being unemployed Cheapy. [:)]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="lappinitup"][quote user="Cheap Cheap Canaries"]No manager is going to step down to be somebodys assistant , just wont happen .[/quote] It''s a step up from being unemployed Cheapy. [:)][/quote]Hes just vowed to get us back on track just like he vowed to make Carrow Road a fortress and just like he vowed to make Pearce hurt at the weekend . Hes going nowhere so we will just have to come to terms that there will be no promotion this season .The nice guy who was one of us and would fall on his sword apperars to be not so nice after all and would rather see a collegue decapitated than lose his glamour job .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Malky would only come here in the summer if he could bring his own team in..the board said no so he turned us down...so forget him..its history

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whether he has been charged or not do we want to be associated with that type of person?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote user="ZippersLeftFoot"]Whether he has been charged or not do we want to be associated with that type of person?[/quote]Lol, so you''re convicting him without trial?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am taking the fact that he has 1) not sued and 2) will not sue for slander and 3) very publically apologised as being pretty clear proof that he admits to the offences. 

 

Not much lol in that I''m afraid

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="ZippersLeftFoot"]

I am taking the fact that he has 1) not sued and 2) will not sue for slander and 3) very publically apologised as being pretty clear proof that he admits to the offences. 

 

Not much lol in that I''m afraid

[/quote]Case closed[Y]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...