Yellowhammer 86 Posted November 15, 2014 Pity we could not have kept some of our loans players we have had at carrow road , Harry Kane , Kieren Gibbs , Frazier foster ,Ryan Bertrand have all done well for themselves and would have been good additions . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tonymoroni 0 Posted November 16, 2014 Perhaps we can get Kyle Naughton back in January . I believe he is available. Right back sorted! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Herman 9,710 Posted November 16, 2014 Frazer was the only one that impressed while he was here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Jenkins 0 Posted November 16, 2014 It still amazes me when I see Gibbs now and recall his loan spell here. He was very young as was Kane, because they were young hot shots from big clubs we expected too much of them, they were immature as players and probably as individuals. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Herman 9,710 Posted November 16, 2014 Pretty much spot on. Too young, too raw for us at the time. Kane has surprised me a lot. I thought he was another of Harry''s follies. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrs miggins 0 Posted November 16, 2014 Agree with H. When Harry Kane came here he looked as if it would take him a spell in the championship to get the experience and game time he needed, looked far to inexperienced. Now he''s banging them in for Spurs just a season or so later, you could blame hughton, you could blame the young boy Kane but it was probably both....but mostly hughton it seems now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lake district canary 4,531 Posted November 16, 2014 [quote user="mrs miggins"]Agree with H. When Harry Kane came here he looked as if it would take him a spell in the championship to get the experience and game time he needed, looked far to inexperienced. Now he''s banging them in for Spurs just a season or so later, you could blame hughton, you could blame the young boy Kane but it was probably both....but mostly hughton it seems now.[/quote]Wasn''t he thrown into the deep end because of injury? Can''t remember exactly, but I seem to remember that his first chance came in a pressurised situation where he was put through on his weaker side, had one chance and fluffed it. From that one chance it seemed to me he was judged, found guilty and deemed useless by our more knowledgable fans. In the other games I saw, he was workmanlike and moved well, without really impressing, but was not a flop. The damaging thing for a highly thought of young player at that time was to be rubbished by sections of our fans from day one.......oh, but I forgot, fans don''t have any influence on players do they......... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrs miggins 0 Posted November 16, 2014 yeah I think you''re right LDC, in retrospect he was a casualty of hughton''s failure Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dubai Mark 0 Posted November 16, 2014 With Kane it was just bad luck, nothing to do with Chris Hughton......for heavens sake ! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrs miggins 0 Posted November 16, 2014 it certainly did, but bad luck was I guess also a part of it if you believe in bad luck. There was such pressure for Hughton not to start kane as fans immediately saw him and thought he was $hit because he didn''t play well in his first match, that was unlucky, it was unlucky that hughton was so under pressure. As a manager who''s not picking up wins, youth don''t tend to get starts, it''s normally the experienced players who you know the sort of performance you''re gonna get from. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Move Klose 303 Posted November 16, 2014 Scott Parker. Few years ago that one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrs miggins 0 Posted November 16, 2014 Henri Lansbury''s still a good championship player, we could do with a CM who can pass well Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Move Klose 303 Posted November 16, 2014 Sam vokes has done well since he went to Burnley. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Move Klose 303 Posted November 16, 2014 Ex Loan team currently playingGK - ForsterRB - De LaetLB - GibbsCB - ShackellCB - RM - CM - LansburyCM - ParkerLM - BertrandCF - VokesCF - Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NCFC Sinky 0 Posted November 16, 2014 Well Peter Crouch would easily be the other CF Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Angry 1,545 Posted November 16, 2014 I''d rather have Kyle Naughton at right back! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SwindonCanary 455 Posted November 16, 2014 It''s wishful thinking if anyone thinks we could sign most of these loan players. It was at a time when we didn''t have any money and the reason we loaned them was coz'' we couldn''t afford to buy ''em Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NWC 239 Posted November 16, 2014 [quote user="Mr Angry"]I''d rather have Kyle Naughton at right back![/quote]Agreed!Unlikely to come though unless things improve before January Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mre2 1 Posted November 17, 2014 I thought Gibbs looked a fairly tidy player and showed some nice touches, but I think he was only 17 at the time and physically he didn''t look nowhere near ready. Although it probably didn''t help that he was played in midfield in a team with quite a few other loan players and did get some stick from our fans which would not of done the young lad''s confidence much good. The following season he was playing in the champions league, so he wasn''t as bad as most of our fans thought! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
djc 0 Posted November 17, 2014 CB - Alex PearceCF - Ched Evans..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites