Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  


Recommended Posts

So let''s just get this straight...

We didn''t sack Hughton earlier because there was no credible replacement but when we finally sack him, we replace with someone who was available all along...say what now?!

I''ve nothing against Adams and I think he could do a decent job but surely this just discredits our farcical board still further and the utter nonesense that they come out with.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Create New...