Clint 221 Posted May 22, 2014 So let''s just get this straight...We didn''t sack Hughton earlier because there was no credible replacement but when we finally sack him, we replace with someone who was available all along...say what now?!I''ve nothing against Adams and I think he could do a decent job but surely this just discredits our farcical board still further and the utter nonesense that they come out with. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
