Holtcantshoot 0 Posted May 22, 2014 Successful or not he''s unlikely to be here for 3 years. Why not just offer him the role on a continued basis with a notice period / redundancy package dependent on how long he''s here and when he wants to leave? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Newton 0 Posted May 22, 2014 Why give an in house rookie 3 years12 moths rolling, max 2 years but, 3 years Delia madnessThis is not a professional business decision, was McNally involved ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
paul moy 235 Posted May 22, 2014 Presumably because if we run away with the Championship he could jump ship to another club with no compensation....... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
