mrs miggins 0 Posted April 26, 2014 Apparently RVW in for HooperAnd Goreham said we''re playing the diamond again Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yellow Bird 0 Posted April 26, 2014 Line up : Ruddy; Whittaker, Martin (c), Turner, Olsson; Johnson; Fer, Howson; Snodgrass; Redmond, van Wolfswinkel.Subs :: Bunn (GK), Hooper, Gutierrez, Elmander, R Bennett, Tettey, Josh Murphy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phillip J Fry 0 Posted April 26, 2014 We won''t know the formation until the players line-up on the pitch. It could be a diamond, but I think (or hope) that we''ve gone for the 4-2-3-1 that worked so well against Liverpool. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrs miggins 0 Posted April 26, 2014 If he plays the diamond, I''m switching off Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phillip J Fry 0 Posted April 26, 2014 United have gone 4-4-2 from the looks of it. Back four as expected, Cleverly and Carrick in the centre, Valencia on right, Kagawa on left. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kick it off 1,927 Posted April 26, 2014 First time I''ve been really worried under Adams. Not sure why he is putting the same team out again (albeit RvW instead of Hooper).I could understand if the formation was different, but if we are seriously putting Redmond up front again and playing the diamond, I''m going to find it difficult to put a positive spin on that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kick it off 1,927 Posted April 26, 2014 [quote user="Phillip J Fry"]We won''t know the formation until the players line-up on the pitch. It could be a diamond, but I think (or hope) that we''ve gone for the 4-2-3-1 that worked so well against Liverpool.[/quote]Look at the semi-colons in the club tweet - they denote the formation usually. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phillip J Fry 0 Posted April 26, 2014 [quote user="mrs miggins"]If he plays the diamond, I''m switching off[/quote]It would be a little ridiculous but having looked at Utds formation, a diamond actually might be somewhat worthwhile against a 4-4-2. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iron_stan 0 Posted April 26, 2014 sooooo, one of our strikers finally scores, and still he gets dropped to the bench for the next game and replaced by the dutch wonder Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Holtcantshoot 0 Posted April 26, 2014 Twatting, fucking, bastardly, cunting Wolfswinkel? Shitting tossbags!Hope he finally comes good. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iron_stan 0 Posted April 26, 2014 the striker choice alone is exactly why adams reign should last no longer than the arsenal game Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phillip J Fry 0 Posted April 26, 2014 [quote user="kick it off"][quote user="Phillip J Fry"]We won''t know the formation until the players line-up on the pitch. It could be a diamond, but I think (or hope) that we''ve gone for the 4-2-3-1 that worked so well against Liverpool.[/quote]Look at the semi-colons in the club tweet - they denote the formation usually.[/quote]I''m still going to hope for a 4-2-3-1 until the players positioning on the pitch indicated otherwise. [:)] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dubai Mark 0 Posted April 26, 2014 ASide of him firing blanks I understand why RVW is in, he is that bit quicker than Hooper and more suitable against Manure''s defence. Interesting Hull have just equalised.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrs miggins 0 Posted April 26, 2014 [quote user="mrs miggins"]If he plays the diamond, I''m switching off[/quote]perhaps a bit harsh, by why play the diamond (although no confirmation on that) and RVW when Hooper played well when he started...well he actually scored, scored. He''s a striker and he scored-surely we have to play him again. Also no Tettey in for BJ? And Whittaker still starts...wtf. At least Hull have just scored again.Anyway, hope it works. Come on you canaries Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phillip J Fry 0 Posted April 26, 2014 [quote user="mrs miggins"]perhaps a bit harsh, by why play the diamond (although no confirmation on that)[/quote]I don''t know. He can''t have predicted Man Utd. would go 4-4-2 could he? Even if he has started diamond, I hope that if it doesn''t work he will get his team into a 4-2-3-1 ASAP.[quote user="mrs miggins"]and RVW when Hooper played well when he started...well he actually scored, scored. He''s a striker and he scored-surely we have to play him again.[/quote]Debatable. Hooper was pretty poor against Liverpool IMO. Looked a little slow, touch was very heavy and link up play was initially very poor. RVW will certainly be better at pressing the Utd. centre backs and seeing as it''s Vidic and Ferdinand, I think adopting a pressing game against them is a good idea. [quote user="mrs miggins"] Also no Tettey in for BJ? And Whittaker still starts...wtf. canaries[/quote]The only reason I can think for Johnson over Tettey is that Johnson is left footed and may bring better balance to the side, he isn''t a better footballer. Whittaker deserves the start, he looked very good offensively againstn Liverpool and defnsively he wasn''t that much worse than Martin has been for previous games. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Surfer 1,547 Posted April 26, 2014 RvW and Hooper have been poor all season, and Hooper could hardly have failed to score that one against Liverpool, so if it''s Adam''s judgement that RvW is the better option to start, that''s fine with me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrs miggins 0 Posted April 26, 2014 I dunno. Give that chance to ricky, who knows. Its like Torres when he went round the goalkeeper and missed the open goal....you never know. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrs miggins 0 Posted April 26, 2014 And thats why you don''t put Whittaker in the team Share this post Link to post Share on other sites