Since 1980 27 Posted April 26, 2014 Scored against Liverpool yet was dropped in favour of RVV. Doesn''t make sense. Does it make sense to anyone here? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Brownstone 0 Posted April 26, 2014 Carrying a knock according to rumours. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
priceyrice 123 Posted April 26, 2014 Just said the same on another thread. It has confused me for most of the season this desire to play Hooper one game and RVW the next, even more so after scoring - must be an appearance clause in his contract Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
City 2nd 191 Posted April 26, 2014 priceyrice wrote the following post at 2014-04-27 1:35 AM:Just said the same on another thread. It has confused me for most of the season this desire to play Hooper one game and RVW the next, even more so after scoring - must be an appearance clause in his contract See other thread pricey! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
walks on water 0 Posted April 26, 2014 The fact that after early promise, Hooper looks ''jaded'' whereas RvW is still very much up for it ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ron obvious 1,502 Posted April 26, 2014 Elmander looked more likely to score than either. They are both pants. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
damn that Ralph Coates! 47 Posted April 26, 2014 got to agree... (Hooper good in 6 yard box though, but we rarely get that close to their goal recently). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Clever Farke 64 Posted April 27, 2014 Elmander- he has been completely misused, today he showed little boy lostwinkle how to do it. Let him start the last 2 games för helvete! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
