Since 1980 27 Posted April 21, 2014 So many more than with CH. So far averaging 1.5 a game. Shame he wasn''t appointed in last autumn. 1.5 a game all season would have meant we could have had 49.5 by now and been safe. I''m optimistic about him keeping his job. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
morty 0 Posted April 21, 2014 [quote user="Mellow yellow 4 ever"]So many more than with CH. So far averaging 1.5 a game. Shame he wasn''t appointed in last autumn. 1.5 a game all season would have meant we could have had 49.5 by now and been safe. I''m optimistic about him keeping his job.[/quote]And for the sake of balance, we have conceded 4, an average of 2 a game.[;)] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dubai Mark 0 Posted April 21, 2014 Great piece of analysis Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Brownstone 0 Posted April 21, 2014 1.5 goals per game? Are we counting Fer''s ruled out effort at Craven Cottage? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Jenkins 0 Posted April 21, 2014 Goals scored to goals conceded is exactly the same ratio as under CH Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Jenkins 0 Posted April 21, 2014 Who would have thought it Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
A Load of Squit 5,112 Posted April 21, 2014 [quote user="morty"][quote user="Mellow yellow 4 ever"]So many more than with CH. So far averaging 1.5 a game. Shame he wasn''t appointed in last autumn. 1.5 a game all season would have meant we could have had 49.5 by now and been safe. I''m optimistic about him keeping his job.[/quote]And for the sake of balance, we have conceded 4, an average of 2 a game.[;)][/quote]Just think how entertaining it would be if we lost every game 2 - 1.5 [;)] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mr Jenkins 0 Posted April 21, 2014 There would be a lot of arguments Squit Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Since 1980 27 Posted April 21, 2014 Rather lose a game by scoring than not scoring. Perhaps you lot are negative CH fans. Best you go and support whichever teams he manages in future. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
splutcho 173 Posted April 21, 2014 We average 1 goal a game under him don''t we? We also have no points. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mrs miggins 0 Posted April 21, 2014 he''s had 2 games, are you lot serious? (apologies if you are) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
morty 0 Posted April 21, 2014 [quote user="mrs miggins"]he''s had 2 games, are you lot serious? (apologies if you are)[/quote]Of course not[;)] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
# 0 Posted April 21, 2014 [quote user="Mellow yellow 4 ever"]Rather lose a game by scoring than not scoring. Perhaps you lot are negative CH fans. Best you go and support whichever teams he manages in future. [/quote] Huzzah! [Y] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
......and Smith must score. 1,331 Posted April 21, 2014 [quote user="Mr Brownstone"]1.5 goals per game? Are we counting Fer''s ruled out effort at Craven Cottage?[/quote][:$] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
