Dubai Mark 0 Posted March 3, 2014 How Stoke City can even consider an appeal if Charlie Adam gets charged for his offence is beyond me, it was a crazy moment from a very influential player for them, that must see him banned for three matches. It will be good news for us as he will be missed by Stoke, often makes them tick and is good on assists and scores crucial occasional goals too..........BUT....he certainly has, shall we say thug tendancies as was shown at the weekend. I will take anything going if it improves our chances of staying up and to date our luck has been minimal........ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Graham Paddons Beard 2,424 Posted March 3, 2014 Interesting. Be unusual for an incident to be brought by the FA NOT to result in a ban. Adam is a nasty piece of work. Mind you I was pleased when Carroll got banned for West Ham. That worked well didn''t it? [:|] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
......and Smith must score. 1,336 Posted March 3, 2014 If we''re worried whether or not a Stoke player will be playing against us on Saturday we''re seriously in the s*it...... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yellow Green Army 237 Posted March 4, 2014 Charlie Adam is garbage anyway!!! Would rather he played. Never seen him as a real threat. We cope with that type of player, its players with pace and power that we need to worry about. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dubai Mark 0 Posted March 4, 2014 Every side is happy if another sides better or key players is missing, every side........as for Charlie Adam being "garbage", not my type of player, BUT ask Arsenal if he is garbage, for Stoke he is influential and right now I will take any side with one or two of their influential players missing, even if it didnt work out that way at West Ham. In reverse, clearly when we diont have that solid three man unit we are easier to over run, just ask Villa..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nicko 0 Posted March 5, 2014 More fearful of Odemwingie to be honest. Our defence find it difficult to deal with that kind of pace. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bethnal Yellow and Green 1,557 Posted March 5, 2014 [quote user="Nicko"]More fearful of Odemwingie to be honest. Our defence find it difficult to deal with that kind of pace.[/quote] Was subbed off at half time for being useless last time he was at Carrow Road. Charlie Adam is Stoke''s best player - rather pleased he will most likely miss the match on Saturday (and hopefully a few other Stoke games). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tetteys Jig 830 Posted March 5, 2014 Confirmed he''ll miss out. I just hope it doesn''t turn out like the West Ham game where they won despite Carroll missing out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thirsty Lizard 3,155 Posted March 5, 2014 Adam being out should definitely be good news for us. Can''t help wondering about this ''Independent Regulatory Commission'' though. I think they got it quite right in this case, but is there anyone (apart from some or all the members of this panel) who thought that Yaya Toure shouldn''t have got a three game ban for kicking RVW.It just stinks of one rule/interpretation for the big clubs and another for the rest. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Yorkshire Canary 118 Posted March 5, 2014 This is good news whether we take advantage is another thing Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
