Houston Canary 0 Posted November 3, 2013 I see this rationalization on many threads as reason to let our trainwreck of a season with the same engineer. My question is, who will be available in 3 weeks that isn''t available today? Also, why would this mystery manager want on board when we''re even deeper in the mire and losing has become acceptable? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wcorkcanary 4,334 Posted November 3, 2013 New Manager doesnt have to be ''available'' if we pay for players in transfer fees, why not pay compensation to get the right man? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Houston Canary 0 Posted November 3, 2013 Good point wcc, but then why wait 3 more games? Why make the job look even more hopeless and less attractive? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Katie Borkins 1 Posted November 3, 2013 That reminds me of when I was after this bird from the typing pool but I was already engaged to this other one from accounts. God that was messy. If I was McNally then I reckon I''d make a clean break first before pulling the new one, otherwise that''s going to end up with a glass of Babycham in someone''s face at the Boulton and Paul Christmas party and lots of crying in the toilets. I speak from experience, so you might as well listen up. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites