hogesar 9,618 Posted November 11, 2013 [quote user="First Wizard"]What will it take?..........a new club and manager imo.[/quote]Yeah, in the Championship. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
*** 0 Posted November 11, 2013 [quote user="hogesar"][quote user="First Wizard"]What will it take?..........a new club and manager imo.[/quote] Yeah, in the Championship.[/quote] If he''s only that standand...........why did Hughton bring him to City?[:|] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lincoln canary (& Golden Coppel) 0 Posted November 11, 2013 [quote user="First Wizard"][quote user="hogesar"][quote user="First Wizard"]What will it take?..........a new club and manager imo.[/quote] Yeah, in the Championship.[/quote]Â If he''s only that standand...........why did Hughton bring him to City?[:|][/quote]One might say he incompetently misjudged the ability of Becchio. I say becchio is a top championship player who will probably never consistently be able to compete in the premiership but certainly good enough to raise his game on occasions and have a positive impact. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wcorkcanary 4,329 Posted November 11, 2013 How the hell can it be judged that he''s a top championship player(i''m not saying you''re wrong) but not good enough for mid table premIge if he doesnt get to play in prem lge.kin hell, hoops was a top striker in scotland ffs, and that doesnt tell us much....and he''s getting game time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hogesar 9,618 Posted November 12, 2013 [quote user="First Wizard"][quote user="hogesar"][quote user="First Wizard"]What will it take?..........a new club and manager imo.[/quote] Yeah, in the Championship.[/quote]Â If he''s only that standand...........why did Hughton bring him to City?[:|][/quote]Oh no, i''m not saying that. But he''s hardly going to get another prem club when he''s been with us and not played, is he?I think he should get a chance. Off the bench. Every now and again. Create some competition. Our strikers haven''t been top drawer so why not mix it up.BUT he might not be Prem class. I reckon he probably isn''t. But i don''t think Kamara is either - yet he had a useful impact at times.Either way, yes it''s a bad signing by Hughton - if that''s what you''re looking for. Because we''ve got a striker who in our managers eyes isn''t good enough. But on balance, he''s certainly made more good signings than he has bad Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Syteanric 1 Posted November 12, 2013 [quote user="First Wizard"][quote user="hogesar"][quote user="First Wizard"]What will it take?..........a new club and manager imo.[/quote] Yeah, in the Championship.[/quote]Â If he''s only that standand...........why did Hughton bring him to City?[:|][/quote]probably for the same reason we bought a certain Jamie Cureton back... the manager felt he could fit into a system, he couldnt.. he moved on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ref89 0 Posted November 12, 2013 We got becchio in to get Morison out. Simple.If he was any good he would get game time.But don''t let that stop the Hughton vendetta.[quote user="lincoln canary"]It is really poor man management. Hughton has literally destroyed his career. He should be given a chance especially since our poor goal scoring record.Do you think Becchio currently gives a toss whether we win or not?[/quote] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GJP 79 Posted November 12, 2013 Had Becchio scored before Kamara did it probably would have turned out a bit better for him. Hughton would have likely thrown his backing behind him. After that it never looked likely he would be a first choice player and you can''t expect him to be after the big money arrivals of RVW and Hooper. I think though, for anyone who has watched a fair bit of Becchio in the past, it''s hard to see what Elmander has done in a Norwich shirt that Becchio couldn''t have done. Becchio probably also carries a greater goal scoring threat. Perhaps Hughton turned to Elmander because of his greater top flight experience but that doesn''t mean Becchio couldn''t have done it, if given the opportunity. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RvWs 4 year contract 0 Posted November 12, 2013 [quote user="nutty nigel"]And what about Carlo Nash. Now I know he''s third choice but you could easily find Ruddy suspended and Bunn injured. Hughton''s not doing him any favours by not playing him................... [/quote]Ha! Good point.Just imagine if we''d spent all that money on RvW and Hoops to start the season with Becchio upfront.People (like Lincoln Canary) would have a s*** fit! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites