Match thread vs Stoke

[snake-eyes 13]

Elmander not Hooper ! Odd?

[rock bus 851]

Not convinced re Elmander but wolf wasn''t holding the ball up and that is probably what we need

[ron obvious 1,502]

Bloody Hell, I thought, we''ve just brought Holt on. He''s lost a bit of weight though ...

[Juggy 0]

[quote user="iron_stan"]elmander for wolfreally ?

same old negative hughton[/quote]

Van Wolfswinkel was getting bullied off the park and then limped off you bloody idiot. 

[norfolkbroadslim 223]

Can''t believe Mr Anonymous is coming on! FFS!!!

[BOO 0]

I can see why it''s elmander! would have preferred hooper but there you go

[iron_stan 0]

so you dont think hooper would be a better idea then

retard

[Brightside 0]

A good positive substitution. Just think we need a bit more pressure and urgency in final third and stop inviting them forward. Great so far, if we can nick another it''d be job done

[Juggy 0]

Playing two right wingers and no left winger, well you can''t accuse Hughton of not trying anything new. 

I tried that on football manager once, didn''t work. 

[Houston Canary 0]

Seems a good sub to me.

[Juggy 0]

[quote user="iron_stan"]so you dont think hooper would be a better idea then retard[/quote]

No I don''t because that wouldn''t have solved the problem of Van Wolfswinkel getting bullied off the park would it. 

retard

[Wings of a Sparrow 1,414]

We are still winning right?

[NWC 239]

Whitaker on - Hooper not getting a game today :(

[Juggy 0]

[quote user="Wings of a Sparrow"]We are still winning right?[/quote]

In the real world we are, in Iron Stan''s and Lincoln Canary''s world we are getting thrashed.

Too much LSD as teenagers I think. 

[Kanadyan Kanary 121]

Whittaker - so now we are trying to close up shop, despite us doing so well as a defensive force with our first half attacking play.

[Juggy 0]

[quote user="Kanadyan Kanary"]Whittaker - so now we are trying to close up shop, despite us doing so well as a defensive force with our first half attacking play.

[/quote]

Whittaker is our joint top scorer with Hooper and Elmander. 

He is also our top scorer in the Premier League.

Just sayin! 

[norfolkbroadslim 223]

[quote user="The New Boy Le Juge"][quote user="iron_stan"]

so you dont think hooper would be a better idea then

retard
[/quote]

No I don''t because that wouldn''t have solved the problem of Van Wolfswinkel getting bullied off the park would it. 

retard

[/quote]

 

And Mr Anonymous will???

 

Moron

[Juggy 0]

[quote user="The New Boy Le Juge"][quote user="Kanadyan Kanary"]Whittaker - so now we are trying to close up shop, despite us doing so well as a defensive force with our first half attacking play.

[/quote]

Whittaker is our joint top scorer with Hooper and Elmander. 

He is also our top scorer in the Premier League.

Just sayin! 

[/quote]

*joint top scorer + a joint top scorer in the Premier League.

[Juggy 0]

[quote user="norfolkbroadslim"][quote user="The New Boy Le Juge"][quote user="iron_stan"]so you dont think hooper would be a better idea then retard[/quote]

No I don''t because that wouldn''t have solved the problem of Van Wolfswinkel getting bullied off the park would it. 

retard

[/quote]

And Mr Anonymous will???

Moron

[/quote]

Those who had their knives out sharpened against Hughton are getting frustrated with our impending victory.

Those who were getting concerned but wanted us to win today are enjoying the game.

Any excuse to slate him. 

[Mister Chops 7]

Stoke could play all day and not score, they are dire.

[norfolkbroadslim 223]

too deep, FFS

[NWC 239]

wherer TF did 4 mins come from???

[norfolkbroadslim 223]

[quote user="Mister Chops"]Stoke could play all day and not score, they are dire.

[/quote]

 

I hope you''re not tempting fate there!

[A Gay Schoolboy 0]

[quote user="The New Boy"]

Those who had their knives out sharpened against Hughton are getting frustrated with our impending victory.

Those who were getting concerned but wanted us to win today are enjoying the game.

Any excuse to slate him. 

[/quote]I''m pleased that we look to be picking up 3 points but if you enjoyed this second half there''s something a bit wrong with you imo

[Robert911 0]

[quote user="NWC"]wherer TF did 4 mins come from???[/quote]I''m wondering that. No injuries, no major stoppages? Hughesie Time?

[Fiery Zac 1,066]

[quote user="NWC"]wherer TF did 4 mins come from???[/quote]

Exactly my thoughts. No injuries. Stoke made 2 subs at half time and 1 in play and we''ve made 2.

[Kanadyan Kanary 121]

Been pleased with the desire and fight we have shown today which is way better than that insipid performance against Spurs.  Attitude has been much better today.

[Juggy 0]

[quote user="Dandy Mountfarto"][quote user="The New Boy"]

Those who had their knives out sharpened against Hughton are getting frustrated with our impending victory.

Those who were getting concerned but wanted us to win today are enjoying the game.

Any excuse to slate him. 

[/quote]I''m pleased that we look to be picking up 3 points but if you enjoyed this second half there''s something a bit wrong with you imo[/quote]

We''ve done an excellent job of neutralising a team who made two attacking substitutions at half time, are playing at home, and have a 6ft 8" striker on the pitch. In the process we have managed to create an end to end game, and almost saw our out of form winger score an absolute top class goal.

We''ve done an excellent job today against a difficult team to beat. 

[Bws Cat 0]

Excellent three points today lads!

[iron_stan 0]

good first half. unconvincing second