Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Hannibal II

Manager win % Worthy onwards...

Recommended Posts

Name

Nigel Worthington 4 December 2000 2 October 2006 280 114 104 62 %40.7

Peter Grant 13 October 2006 9 October 2007 54 18 12 24 %33.3

Glenn Roeder 30 October 2007 14 January 2009 65 20 15 30 %30.8

Bryan Gunn 16 January 2009 13 August 2009 21 6 5 10 %28.6

Paul Lambert 18 August 2009 2 June 2012 142 70 37 35 %49.3

Chris Hughton 6 June 2012 Present 46 14 14 16 %30.43

Peter Grant and Glenn Roeder both have a better win % than good ole Chris just stats but he has a much better team than those guys ever did. Only marginally better win % than Gunn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="Hannibal II"]Name

Nigel Worthington 4 December 2000 2 October 2006 280 114 104 62 %40.7

Peter Grant 13 October 2006 9 October 2007 54 18 12 24 %33.3

Glenn Roeder 30 October 2007 14 January 2009 65 20 15 30 %30.8

Bryan Gunn 16 January 2009 13 August 2009 21 6 5 10 %28.6

Paul Lambert 18 August 2009 2 June 2012 142 70 37 35 %49.3

Chris Hughton 6 June 2012 Present 46 14 14 16 %30.43

Peter Grant and Glenn Roeder both have a better win % than good ole Chris just stats but he has a much better team than those guys ever did. Only marginally better win % than Gunn[/quote]

And which one of those managers came in to the club and from scratch kept the team in the premiership in their first season,  beating Arsenal, ManU and Man City on the way?

  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="Hannibal II"]Name

Nigel Worthington 4 December 2000 2 October 2006 280 114 104 62 %40.7

Peter Grant 13 October 2006 9 October 2007 54 18 12 24 %33.3

Glenn Roeder 30 October 2007 14 January 2009 65 20 15 30 %30.8

Bryan Gunn 16 January 2009 13 August 2009 21 6 5 10 %28.6

Paul Lambert 18 August 2009 2 June 2012 142 70 37 35 %49.3

Chris Hughton 6 June 2012 Present 46 14 14 16 %30.43

Peter Grant and Glenn Roeder both have a better win % than good ole Chris just stats but he has a much better team than those guys ever did. Only marginally better win % than Gunn[/quote]means nothing at all.all the other managers managed at a lower level.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It''s apples and oranges really. When we''ve been in the Championship we''ve had reasonable budgets compared to the competition, by Premier League standards our budget is tiny.

On the other side LDC, you make it sound like he took over a team in trouble and kept us up against the odds (Roeder?!), when in realty he took a team that finished comfortably in mid table and improved the squad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
i find it interesting that although they have similar win ratios three were lambasted out of the club pretty much unanimously.

As for different league i would say the difference in quality in the squads more than compensates for the differing league between the managers wouldnt you say? and we all know what a competitive league the Championship is.

Also I don''t care who we beat last year its not like you get 6 points for beating the team who wins the league. I''m far more worried by the list of teams we''ve lost to under Hughton than i am satisfied with the teams we have beaten.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="Hannibal II"]i find it interesting that although they have similar win ratios three were lambasted out of the club pretty much unanimously.

As for different league i would say the difference in quality in the squads more than compensates for the differing league between the managers wouldnt you say? and we all know what a competitive league the Championship is.

Also I don''t care who we beat last year its not like you get 6 points for beating the team who wins the league. I''m far more worried by the list of teams we''ve lost to under Hughton than i am satisfied with the teams we have beaten.[/quote]

That''s a shame - it means you worry more about our defeats than you enjoy our victories.   Is that right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Well researched H2:

And interesting to say the least, 3 were sacked on the basis of those figures, and Grant walked.

Over to McNally methinks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kolin Kob wrote the following post:

means nothing at all.

all the other managers managed at a lower level.

Really!

Who took us to the premier league in 2003/04 and managed us for two years and failed to keep us in that league?

Check your facts before replying sir!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LDC while i can understand your assumption from my previous statement let me make it clear i am a lot happier than most when we win i can assure you that. I simply mean we lose and perform very badly against teams below and around us. (our main competition) Last season we took the most points off of the top 6 teams that finished outside of it but on the other hand we had the worst points tally against the other 13 teams other than those relegated. i find that worrying as we can''t rely on beating the top 6 clubs every year to stay up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Complete and utter nonsense to make win ratio comparisons between divisions when we can''t compete financially in hte premier league

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Based on league matches in the top division only, Worthy''s win % was 18, Hoots stands at 25% and Lambert at 31%.All are some way behind Mike Walker''s staggering 50% in 1992/3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What nonsense you talk we are the 8th highest spenders on transfers in the premier league this transfer window. sounds like we compete better than most financially at the moment to me....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 transfer window not finished

2 you have to look at wages as well which are the main prediction of league success

3 A squad takes time to build. We have had to pay 20m of external debt off over the last 2 seasons which has seriously handicapped us compared to the few other clubs which are wither mcuh larger or the majority of mid-table teams which are subsidised by benefactors.

4 We actually have the 17th largest financial investment in the squad in the premier league over the last few seasons

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...