shardy 0 Posted May 17, 2005 oh my god why didn''t we think of this, it could have been the answer 3-5-2 greeno flem/eddy/doc shacks charlton/drury helveg bentley francis saffri hux deano leon you know I think I could be on to something here I think this would strengthen our defence and midfield, would give support to left back area and almost free hux to do what he does best, attack. worthy give this a thought Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ZLF 261 Posted May 17, 2005 I am sure that went through the discussions of formations back in nov/dec. It requires a lot from the wingbacks and that means hux in your formation - simply not one.As most of you will know I prefer a 4-5-1 variation 4-2-3-1 Green Helveg Charlton Shackell Drury Safri Francis Jonson Bentley Hux Ashton. Gives us a 5 man midfield defensively, with either bentley or Dam covering when Hux gets stuck up field.Gives us 4 mobile attacks who can move at pace to the heart of the opposition.For next season we would need cover for Safri/Francis and a Bentley (& Francis?) replacement. A new younger right back is needed and possible a partner for shacks although Doc and charlie should be good enough next season.I expect a 4-4-2 or a 4-3-3 as season at the end of last season to be the way we play though. OTBC Share this post Link to post Share on other sites