hogesar 9,615 Posted September 14, 2013 WHY NOT MAKE AN ATTACKING SUBSTITUTION. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tetteys Jig 830 Posted September 14, 2013 Disappointed we never saw Olsson or Hooper today.If Olsson had come on for Garrido and played well, it''d have given Hughton a good dilemma at Left Back and if Hooper had come on, he''d have got them important few mins out of the way and been stronger for it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Helsinki canary 240 Posted September 14, 2013 Agree that Olsson should of replaced garrido, all the spurs threats and goals came down hs side, also hooper should of replaced the wolf who fluffed our only chance of the game Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Making Plans 936 Posted September 14, 2013 And we took our best player off. Unbelievable sub decisions again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hogesar 9,615 Posted September 14, 2013 If we''re 1-0 down, then making a substitution like Howson on for Johnson is fair enough in my book.When you''ve created literally nothing - and you''re 2-0 down, with 40 minutes left. You need to change things up! Do we have a game plan when we go behind away from home? It really doesn''t look like it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Helsinki canary 240 Posted September 14, 2013 Agree that Olsson should of replaced garrido, all the spurs threats and goals came down hs side, also hooper should of replaced the wolf who fluffed our only chance of the game Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hogesar 9,615 Posted September 14, 2013 Could have gone 2 up front for the last 15 minutes or so rather than bringing Tettey on (what was the point?!).At the very least a run out for Hooper and if him or Wolf scored, helps their confidence going into Villa next week. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites