Juggy 0 Posted July 4, 2013 CURRENT SUBTOTALS: Keep: 47Sell: 4 Void Votes: 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mervmeister 18 Posted July 4, 2013 KeepHowever only for depth personally Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Man Who Stares At Goats 0 Posted July 4, 2013 KEEP! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xxxx 0 Posted July 4, 2013 Sell , he wont play so cash in . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ricardo 7,768 Posted July 4, 2013 Not for sale IMO. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blurboy1980 36 Posted July 4, 2013 Keep.For what he has done for this club he should get to decide his future and how he goes out. In a few years he has become a legend. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Juggy 0 Posted July 4, 2013 CURRENT SUBTOTALS: Keep: 58Sell: 6Void Votes: 4 My faith in Norwich supporters is well on the way to being restored. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Webbo118 0 Posted July 4, 2013 Was this really necessary? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Michael Bates 12 Posted July 4, 2013 Keep, worth keeping to be 5th striker even! 2-3 million is nothing and look how much we would have improved if he does stay and is far behind the pecking order... Martin, Vaughan, Wilbraham etc...! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PurpleCanary 6,139 Posted July 4, 2013 [quote user="TheNewBoy"]CURRENT SUBTOTALS: Keep: 58Sell: 6Void Votes: 4 My faith in Norwich supporters is well on the way to being restored. [/quote] As Official Scrutineer I have to warn posters that the above totals are serioulsy wrong. I am formally scrubbing no fewer than 10 of the "KEEP" votes - for exampe use of exclamation marks is plainly prohibited under the rules - and three of the "SELL" votes. My current tally is 49 "KEEPS" and three "SELLS".I must say I am surprised not many posters were worried by the implications of voting "KEEP" when this means, by the terms of the OP, that we cannot sell Grant until the summer of 2015, but obviously that was factored in. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Juggy 0 Posted July 4, 2013 I exercised my right to thread-starter discretion, but will accept 49-3 as that increases the margin significantly :) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Juggy 0 Posted July 4, 2013 [quote user="Webbo118"]Was this really necessary?[/quote]Probably not necessary, but for me it is proving worthwhile. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Juggy 0 Posted July 4, 2013 [quote user="TheNewBoy"]I exercised my right to thread-starter discretion, but will accept 49-3 as that increases the margin significantly :) [/quote](when expressed as a percentage of the vote, on a scale of 0% to 100%). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GenerationA47 817 Posted July 4, 2013 Kay ee ee peeKEEP Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
