Mervmeister 18 Posted July 9, 2013 http://app.tribalfootball.com/?referrer=http://www.tribalfootball.com/articles/norwich-chelsea-man-city-go-celtic-keeper-forster-3967840#article/tribalfootball-3967840No idea if anything in it. Would we rather Chelsea directly went for hooper or would we be happier to let ruddy go and get Forster possibly slightly cheaper making small profit? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Juggy 0 Posted July 9, 2013 What has Hooper got to do with it?Correct link: http://www.tribalfootball.com/articles/norwich-chelsea-man-city-go-celtic-keeper-forster-3967840#.UduUxvm1FUA Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mervmeister 18 Posted July 9, 2013 Lol my bad meant Forster. Early mornings kill me lol. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
paul moy 235 Posted July 9, 2013 A no brainer. Forster is better than Ruddy but we must get him before we sell !!!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Foghorn 0 Posted July 9, 2013 According to some press reports this morning, Cheski''s "improved" bid for Ruddy was £6M - are they taking the pi55???If I was Ruddy, I''d feel insulted!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
paul moy 235 Posted July 9, 2013 [quote user="Foghorn"]According to some press reports this morning, Cheski''s "improved" bid for Ruddy was £6M - are they taking the pi55???If I was Ruddy, I''d feel insulted!![/quote]We should not be taking less than 12 million IMO. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jedi 0 Posted July 9, 2013 Forster better than Ruddy?? I have to disagree he''s a good keeper but he''s not better than Ruddy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Highland Canary 76 Posted July 9, 2013 Think Forster is at least as good as Ruddy.Let''s hope we don''t let Ruddy go before a replacement is lined up.We''ve just done the same with Holt - sold before a replacement is signed - we now need two or three strikers and other clubs know that. Look what happened last season when we loaned Vaughan without a replacement. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Joanna Grey 0 Posted July 9, 2013 Two or three? We already have two, if CH plays one up front and gets more offensive players in the mould of Toivonen then we only need one other striker. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
clarkey1972 0 Posted July 9, 2013 Forster would be my choice replacement, but he is not better than ruddy.We will struggle to find a keeper better than him, fact, but forster has the potential to rival him at international level.We mustbdo everything to hold onto ruddy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tetteys Jig 830 Posted July 9, 2013 I think Forster would be a better fit for Chelsea than Ruddy.He''s equally as promising, probably wouldn''t mind being sat on the bench a bit and has a few more years on his side.I reckon they''d get him for £5m too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tetteys Jig 830 Posted July 9, 2013 In a sense, if he moved to either us or chelsea, i''d be delighted as it would assure us a class goalkeeper either way. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Webbo118 0 Posted July 9, 2013 [quote user="paul moy"]A no brainer. Forster is better than Ruddy but we must get him before we sell !!!![/quote] No surprise here. Still clueless. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
*** 0 Posted July 9, 2013 Tribal Football? Dear oh dear![:S] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
morty 0 Posted July 9, 2013 [quote user="jedi"]Forster better than Ruddy?? I have to disagree he''s a good keeper but he''s not better than Ruddy.[/quote]This^^^ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ROBFLECK 132 Posted July 9, 2013 jedi wrote:Forster better than Ruddy?? I have to disagree he''s a good keeper but he''s not better than Ruddy.yep, I agree with the above too Share this post Link to post Share on other sites