Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
iron_stan

lee griffiths

Recommended Posts

23 in 36 last season, yeh ok it is scotland but he was also playing in a much less capable team than hooper.worth a punt ? we need 2 more strikers imo, along with the "big" money striker we are apparently after city need someone else whos happy to compete for a place and knows where the goal is,  hes young, and wouldnt break the bank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Am I the only one that thinks we only need one more central striker? 4231 or 433 is the way to go so why do we need 4 strikers. Van wolf will play when fit so that leaves becciho and who ever we get fighting over a bench spot. Would rather see Morris or the twins given the forth choice spot. I see a 4th striker (unless young and unproven) a waste of money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cover for injury is vital plus we need a goal scoring number 10.

We need more goals in the Squad and if our new number 10 can get into double figures it will take some pressure off wolfie.

This is the single most important position to fill without a goal scoring number 10 we are likely to be similar to last year and if the opposition marks RVW tight we will not score. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="KeelansGlove"]

Cover for injury is vital plus we need a goal scoring number 10.

We need more goals in the Squad and if our new number 10 can get into double figures it will take some pressure off wolfie.

This is the single most important position to fill without a goal scoring number 10 we are likely to be similar to last year and if the opposition marks RVW tight we will not score. 

[/quote]
[Y]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
im guessing this is a joke. hardly what we need. might aswell have kept vaughan or jackson. we are meant to be going onto the next level not signing rejects. this bloke got loaned out to scotland because not deemed good enough for championship. hes only stayed at wolves because they are now league 1 and thats what scottish prem level is

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[quote user="CDMullins"]Nope file with Kris Boyd, Connor Samman, Scott McDonald and .........Gary Hooper![/quote]
Steven Fletcher came to England and scored more goals than he did in the SPL. There are as many success stories as their are flops. 
Three of our own came to England from the SPL: Robert Snodgrass, Wes Hoolahan, Steven Whittaker. 
Steven Naismith and Shaun Maloney haven''t exactly flopped, think I''d have either of them to compete for the spot behind the striker. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

[quote user="Eadie4England"]im guessing this is a joke. hardly what we need. might aswell have kept vaughan or jackson. we are meant to be going onto the next level not signing rejects. this bloke got loaned out to scotland because not deemed good enough for championship. hes only stayed at wolves because they are now league 1 and thats what scottish prem level is[/quote]
From Wiki:
"In both the 2011–12 and 2012–13 seasons Wolves loaned him out to Hibernian, where he enjoyed considerable success (see below). Following his performances with Hibs, Wolves opted to take up their option of a contract extension, keeping Griffiths under contract until summer 2014.[10] Hibernian subsequently made an offer to acquire Griffiths in a permanent deal, but it was rejected by Wolves, who also stated that they had "no intention of selling the player on to any other club".[11] New Wolves manager Kenny Jackett affirmed that Griffiths was part of his plans for their campaign in League One.[12]"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
For me we definitely need a 4th attacking player - one injury and a or a loss of form and we are where we wee last season - with no options to change to 2 up front either during the game or to start a game.

a player like quag makes sense as the play off a striker - but definitely two more needed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Good question around why not leigh if hooper considered good enough??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...