CanaryNewbee 0 Posted May 6, 2013 If we had John Ruddy all season.We''d be safe and on about 42 to 44 points.Versus Wigan (A)- Would have saved Kones shot= 1 pointVersus WBA (A) Bunn was too short to safe the first goal= 1 to 3 points.Versus Villa (H) First shot from Abonglahor would have been saved= 1 pointMan City (H) The terrible own goal from Bunn wouldn''t have happened if Ruddy was in goal = 3-3 = 1 pointThe players confidence would be up as well because we''d be picking up more points and conceeding less goals and inturn I believe have even more points.Then there''s the refereeing decisions we all know about even more points.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CambridgeCanary 0 Posted May 6, 2013 I agree with your general point. This is not to criticise Bunn who has done well but Ruddy was immense before his injury and worth a goal start just by the confidence he gave the team. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CDMullins 436 Posted May 6, 2013 And Ruddy wouldnt have made any mistakes at all?Pointless thread is pointless Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanaryNewbee 0 Posted May 6, 2013 No I didn''t say he wouldnt have made mistakes but my general point is that we would have more points if Ruddy was in goal all season and if we didn''t have stupid referring decisions go against us. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites