Bws Cat 0 Posted May 12, 2013 Spurs- Stoke ahead of us?Really?Really?-.- Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Herman 9,582 Posted May 12, 2013 Champions league takes precedence nowadays. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aggy 739 Posted May 13, 2013 Stoke and West Brom were both about the same level; nothing for either to play for really. Then you''ve got us - we were an outside relegation bet (but only one of four or five who might go down) or Spurs who are in a 2 way battle with Arsenal for the champions league places.Spurs before us seems just about fair enough if you ask me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
*** 0 Posted May 13, 2013 They looked like they were chewing barb wire when it came to talking about us. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bethnal Yellow and Green 1,557 Posted May 13, 2013 [quote user="Seaside Canary"]They looked like they were chewing barb wire when it came to talking about us.[/quote] I don''t know where people get this impression from. Linekar has often said he really likes Norwich and has a soft spot for the due to some relation coming from Norwich, you can''t accuse Malky of be anti-Norwich and the other two didn''t really say anything. Lawro has been very complimentary of Norwich for most of the season also. I think Spurs - Stoke was earlier as they wanted to bunch all the relegation games together and the fight for Champions'' League means the game had some relevance, unlike Fulham v Liverpool. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites